Straight or gay? U.S. court says Web site can't ask

TalkBack 23 of 30:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

RE: Straight or gay? U.S. court says Web site can't ask

Irrational majority? Why is it irrational to decide that I don't want to live with somebody that practices a behavior that I find objectionable? Is it irrational to say I don't want to live with a cigarette smoker? Is it irrational to say I don't want to live with a drug user? Is it irrational to say I don't want to live with a thief, or a drunk? How about if somebody raises fruit bats for a living, or practices cannibalism, or cooks up crystal meth and I don't want to live with them. Am I being irrational then?

This decision was more about promoting a social agenda than it was about the law. The 9th Circus is located where? You guessed it! San Francisco. This isn't about righting a wrong or protecting gay people from injustice. This is about pushing an agenda that seeks to normalize homosexuality and equate it as equal to heterosexuality.

This was yet another stupid stupid bad decision from the 9th Circus. It will probably be overturned just like most decisions that come from those clowns.

Posted by: TallTomD   Posted on: 04/07/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now