On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Tech in Film/Video/Photo NOT porno driven
Having been trained at one of the worlds best film schoools, and having been taught by the very people responsible for inventing portable film and video equipment, I know for a fact that those improvements had absolutely nothing to do with the porno industry.

Ricky Leacock never watched, let alone shot porno. If not for his early work on portable film equipment and his work with d. p. pennibaker (filmed the famous Dylan biopic "Don;t Look Back" on the worlds first portable film equipment), the tech might not yet exist.

Polaroid Instant Film was invented by a guy who wanted to take pics of his family and show them off imediately, not some dweeb who wanted to film porno.

I worked at the Franklin Institute, and I was part of work that made streaming video for business apps possible. Not one of the people I met had anything remotely related to porno in thier portfolio.

Now, I do not know all the facts behind streaming video, but something tells me that porno had only a terciary contribution. More to do with money waiting to be spent than anything else, in RE: porno. The development was already taking place, porno consumer bucks (these idiots will spend big money on the most retarded looking videos - I know several girls who do streaming live video and they say the idiots have the most retarded requests they've ever hear.) only helped make the tech more affordable to everyone.

BTW, my teacher and my class was in on the development of the Aaton Minima A, the first small footprint 16 mm sound sync film camera. I was shooting with that camera before it was publicly available. Not one of us did it so we could better film porno.
Posted by: Hempman   Posted on: 01/14/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Ah, a victim of it's own success  Boot_Agnostic | 01/13/08
Say what you will...  top100developers | 01/14/08
yes but...  pcguy777 | 01/14/08
Actually, no  Leria | 01/14/08
It amazes me...  Raymond Danner | 01/14/08
They do not hijack domains  Leria | 01/14/08
did you actually say Child Porn should be legal?  conspicuouschick | 01/15/08
Boo Hoo - next it will be 1st Amendment voilation  crljones | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  philbarberg@... | 01/14/08
No, it should not be clean  Leria | 01/14/08
try citing a legit source once in awhile...  conspicuouschick | 01/15/08
AWWWW what a downer  pcguy777 | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  Leria | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  groschuni@... | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  ematthew@... | 01/14/08
Tech in Film/Video/Photo NOT porno driven  Hempman | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  bfilipiak@... | 01/15/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  motorhead1979@... | 01/15/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  johnlong23 | 07/28/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and