On CBS MoneyWatch: Dumbest Things You Do With Money
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
No, it should not be clean
Let me tell you what your real problem with porn is: children see it, get ideas (like they don't have them in the first place, coming from being sexually active at the age of 3 with other children, and 7 with older children and adults), and express their right to sexual pleasure.

Secondly, every single porn manufacturer has checks in place so that children do not get into their sites. They have a big ass front webpage and redirection scripts if there isn't a cookie on your machine that tells you "Do not enter if you are under 18 years of age!" and "If you do enter, it is your responsibility if you are underage!" which it really is!
Most times when children are 'exposed' to pornography, they are curious about it, search for it, and want to look at it, period and done with.

They are NOT getting to it by 'accident'. Secondly, the American porn industry DID try to get a ".XXX" domain so that children would be even MORE safe..... guess what? Your representatives in Congress shut that down, because they were worried that the porn producers would keep their old domains AND get .XXX domains (easily taken care of by legislation).

I have your number.... the real reason that you don't want porn on the internet is because you are a religious conservative who hates sex, without realizing that nature made us with genitals from birth for a reason, because we were MEANT to be sexually active from birth!
Posted by: Leria   Posted on: 01/14/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Ah, a victim of it's own success  Boot_Agnostic | 01/13/08
Say what you will...  top100developers | 01/14/08
yes but...  pcguy777 | 01/14/08
Actually, no  Leria | 01/14/08
It amazes me...  Raymond Danner | 01/14/08
They do not hijack domains  Leria | 01/14/08
did you actually say Child Porn should be legal?  conspicuouschick | 01/15/08
Boo Hoo - next it will be 1st Amendment voilation  crljones | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  philbarberg@... | 01/14/08
No, it should not be clean  Leria | 01/14/08
try citing a legit source once in awhile...  conspicuouschick | 01/15/08
AWWWW what a downer  pcguy777 | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  Leria | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  groschuni@... | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  ematthew@... | 01/14/08
Tech in Film/Video/Photo NOT porno driven  Hempman | 01/14/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  bfilipiak@... | 01/15/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  motorhead1979@... | 01/15/08
RE: Porn companies challenged by Internet sites  johnlong23 | 07/28/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline