Wiretap laws face new static

TalkBack 7 of 11:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Food for thought

Just a small factor that I'd like to point out. I've worked in the telecommunications industry for quite some time, AT&T not too long ago.

I noticed that within the article the companies mentioned were AT&T and Bellsouth, which ironically happen to be the same company today. Do you think that the government's allowance of the restructure of Mob Bell was to allow larger companies to make buyouts of the smaller companies that wanted nothing to do with this new legislation?

The government broke up the Bell's a long time ago, and slowly but surely, the government is allowing them to come back together starting with the big three; AT&T, BellSouth & Southwestern Bell Corporation (SBC).

Just food for thought.

Posted by: robbi_raine@...   Posted on: 10/11/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Open Standards Technologies Provide the Ingredients for Delivering Security Across the Papa Gino's Enterprise Dell Papa Gino's Holdings Corporation founded by the entrepreneur operates one ... Download Now
• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now