On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 98:
Next »
« Previous
Absolutely Yes
In fact, the ability of people to ignore advertising is a concern for the negotiation
between advertiser and publisher.

Also, the html on the News page has been screwed up all week. I think there are
non-conformant missing quotes in attributes. Since I had to open up the source, find
the headline, copy and paste the url to get here, I'd be concerned that ZDNet's
impeding my viewing of ads on an interior page could have the advertising blocking
prosecutors knocking on their door.
Posted by: DannyO_0x98   Posted on: 09/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Because the VCR won - and therefore it's LEGAL.  CobraA1 | 09/14/07
Absolutely Yes  DannyO_0x98 | 09/14/07
A RULING  RS9 | 09/17/07
Not as absurd as it seems  B. Squabble | 09/21/07
What a lot of rubbish  anthony_hunt | 09/14/07
Maybe  seanferd | 09/17/07
aNblock  Caesar Tjalbo | 09/14/07
Ad blocker detection  ivovegter | 09/14/07
He might be able to detect Adblock Plus  James T. Kirk | 09/14/07
Strange  in-DUH-vidual | 09/14/07
Hmm... It stil works for me....  James T. Kirk | 09/14/07
[chuckles]  kcredden2 | 09/14/07
Not just noisy clutter  MoreToys | 09/14/07
fix  AnonymousBugMeNotUser | 09/14/07
re: Ad blocker detection  mrOSX | 09/14/07
Yes, and  aussiedawg | 09/17/07
Illegal? Then the Web is ruined.  robert.paul@... | 09/14/07
I've said it before, and I'll say it again  rpmyers1 | 09/14/07
Yeah, that would be efficient....  BitTwiddler | 09/14/07
They already move away  rpmyers1 | 09/14/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  BitTwiddler | 09/14/07
But he's still right...  robert.paul@... | 09/14/07
RE:  robert.paul@... | 09/14/07
Lawyers can't grook...  LucasKorso | 09/14/07
I Glad I live in the land of the free  wizardb@... | 09/14/07
Message has been deleted.  Henrik Moller | 09/14/07
What's next:  ejhonda | 09/14/07
You should watermark this...  handydan918@... | 09/14/07
Say what?  vger_z | 09/15/07
If it was only your point  RS9 | 09/17/07
Entertaining  cburkitt2 | 09/17/07
Dude, you are so sued  seanferd | 09/17/07
I have two words for them  Linux User 147560 | 09/14/07
Text Browsers  in-DUH-vidual | 09/14/07
I have no moral obligation  frgough | 09/14/07
I agree - it's MY computer & Internet bandwidth  Zolar | 01/30/09
Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  Loverock Davidson | 09/14/07
I agree, but then who really owns...  bjbrock | 09/14/07
Wrong question  Michael Kelly | 09/14/07
I agree with Loverock here  BanjoPaterson | 09/14/07
This is my policy  kcredden2 | 09/14/07
userContent.css can block ads too.  osreinstall | 09/14/07
Sounds like this will just mean  mrjonno | 09/14/07
In the end  osreinstall | 09/14/07
Proxy autoconfig is better than userContent.css or hosts file blocking  johnay | 09/14/07
Proxy servers are the best.  osreinstall | 09/14/07
re: Proxy servers are the best.  johnay | 09/17/07
Got to get off dialup.  osreinstall | 09/17/07
Squidguard does it too  cburkitt2 | 09/17/07
I am sure there are lots of options.  osreinstall | 09/17/07
Just use a Hosts file  1101doc | 09/14/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  vikingnyc@... | 09/14/07
re:just asking  vger_z | 09/15/07
HIVdoesn't cause AIDS???  mithraigor@... | 09/15/07
Surprised they haven't gone after the remote cotrol...  jasonp@... | 09/14/07
They don't have to go after the remote control...  vikingnyc@... | 09/14/07
oh come on...  shravenk | 09/17/07
OH, Please! That's not new...  RS9 | 09/17/07
They did just that on DVDs ...  terry flores | 09/14/07
RE: just that on DVDs...  cburkitt2 | 09/17/07
RE: channel change lockouts  dr_who@... | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  haz113k | 09/14/07
Alternative technologies ...  terry flores | 09/14/07
What if I close my eyes? Will I be fined? -NT  Protector | 09/14/07
I disagree... and here is why  Been_Done_Before | 09/14/07
That is correct...  wmlundine | 09/14/07
How exactly do people expect the web  mrjonno | 09/14/07
Oh please.  James T. Kirk | 09/14/07
I have problems with the Google Text ads  rpmyers1 | 09/14/07
Yeah! Google.  seanferd | 09/17/07
Bingo!  nighthawk808 | 09/14/07
It's a question of what is reasonable  shawkins | 09/15/07
Your post is dead on.  notsofast | 09/17/07
Why are users blocking their ads?  GeoNorth | 09/14/07
Why compare with TV?  Krmurr | 09/14/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  tracy anne | 09/14/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  alxnsc@... | 09/15/07
Ads sux  vger_z | 09/15/07
Nonsense...  cburkitt2 | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  mrudzik | 09/16/07
Who cares? I will still block ads.  kraterz | 09/17/07
Agreed...  JDThompson | 09/17/07
Advertisers, learn restraint and police thy own  Boot_Agnostic | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  hgkll@... | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  crash2007 | 09/17/07
Illegal?  cburkitt2 | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  FColes@... | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  tewb1408a@... | 09/17/07
Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  tewb1408a@... | 09/17/07
(entirely)  cburkitt2 | 09/17/07
To the Website that blocks...  RS9 | 09/17/07
Gee, why would anyone block ads?  seanferd | 09/17/07
Third-Party What?  hforman@... | 09/17/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  stowle48 | 09/18/07
put it to a vote!  grgcro@... | 09/18/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  Stovies | 09/21/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  edinger@... | 10/05/07
RE: Web ad blocking may not be (entirely) legal  Doved41 | 04/20/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here