On The Insider: Criminal Past of Woods Mistress Revealed
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
I see you continue with the numerous
false statements, as is per your norm. But then what better way to gloss over any and all shortcomings and privacy issues of Google then to draw Microsoft into the srticle.

Now, did I miss the section in Google's EULA that states where they will accept responsibility and damages resulting from a bug in Google apps? You are implying that they will accept that as their problem?
Posted by: GuidingLight   Posted on: 09/12/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The problem is the MS EULA. There, you give MS the right to show up at your  DonnieBoy | 09/12/07
I see you continue with the numerous  GuidingLight | 09/12/07
What's with the redirect?  Marty R. Milette | 09/13/07
Well, Google should make the document clearer and make it obvious that  DonnieBoy | 09/12/07
Sorry to hear...  Marty R. Milette | 09/13/07
Reading Comprehension...  ibabadur1 | 09/12/07
No, just a correlation between people who ....  Confused by religion | 09/12/07
True, with a careful reading, you are just giving Google permission to make  DonnieBoy | 09/12/07
How are the documents stored?  THEE WOLF | 09/12/07
For the free services, they will probably at least use the content to  DonnieBoy | 09/12/07
RE: Google denies ownership of users' words  HypnoToad72 | 09/12/07
Better dead than read.  osreinstall | 09/12/07
If you want it private keep it private  lengrif | 09/13/07
Strikes me that Matt Asay  mhenriday | 09/13/07
Eula too  pmbrent@... | 09/13/07
I'm worried  green alien | 09/13/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here