On TV.com: Is COMMUNITY or MODERN FAMILY better?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 37 of 73:
Next »
« Previous
The ruling should be qualified by Judge Grimm's masterful may 4th ruling.
On May 4th 2007, his honor, Chief Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm in Lorraine V Markel set the actual standard for admissibility of Digital Evidence. Check out our page for this landmark it at http://www.wireless-time.com/site/news/news-judicial1.htm

In Lorraine - the judge set a five test standard for ISE (aka Digital Evidence) and its admissibility into the Courts, and we have formally asked the 9th Circuit Distrcit and Apellate Courts to adopt a local ruling mirroring this ruling which would also constrain the "TorrentSpy" ruling as well one would think.

The Lorraine ruling has MANY MANY implications which 99% of the world seems to want to ignore, like for instance that the ruling also includes any and all Federal Agencies and in their operations also constrains the 'quality of digital media' that those Agencies accept from individuals as well. Meaning that it is VERY likely that the Judge's ruling in Lorraine v Markel effects any and all filings of anything with the Federal Government.

WOW...

TGlassey
Posted by: TSGlassey   Posted on: 06/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Evidence from RAM  thejynxed@... | 06/14/07
Let me help your confusion.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Not what the Article Says  AstroCreep | 06/14/07
Its junk law  Cayble | 06/18/07
5th Amendment Protections  Dr. John | 06/19/07
There are a few problems  Freebird54 | 06/14/07
Not to mention that violation of copyright laws  maldain | 06/19/07
Wow  Sneltrekker | 06/14/07
I wish you had the gonads  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
No nads required  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
History repeating?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/14/07
Snap! Ouch!  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
Actually I did  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
No, you did not  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
Whatever little fella...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
It's about your hypocrisy, not how childish your insults are DA  Spoon Jabber | 06/15/07
Taxonomy  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/14/07
You bet it was part of the public record.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
Of course you can't prove it, right.  Spoon Jabber | 06/15/07
link or lie?  jjarman | 06/18/07
wtf does that mean  mindilator@... | 06/18/07
you have a very ironic name, no_axe  mindilator@... | 06/18/07
LA is a bit far from NH  Dr_Zinj | 06/19/07
Let it happen - let it be the law...  BanjoPaterson | 06/14/07
Judges dont make laws...  mrlinux | 06/14/07
"Case Law"  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/14/07
Well since this is a dump one...  mrlinux | 06/14/07
They shouldn't, but....  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
If there was no law then why the court case?  voska | 06/14/07
Case law  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
Not exactly right on the "states" thing.  chemist109 | 06/14/07
I said "Paraphrase", cut me some slack. happy  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
Oh, I had a question  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
Correction: Judges are not supposed to make law...  Raymond Danner | 06/19/07
You're not lying!  HouseOfZen | 06/14/07
Bigger fish  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/14/07
The ruling should be qualified by Judge Grimm's masterful may 4th ruling.  TSGlassey | 06/14/07
Is this a joke?  Stuka | 06/14/07
Cool - get those terabyte drives out  kokuryu | 06/14/07
Yes, thieves often find there are serious costs.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/14/07
The "thieves" aren't the ones paying DA!  Spoon Jabber | 06/14/07
Re. Cool - get those terabyte drives out  osokona@... | 06/15/07
ram must be preserved?  Kool-aid | 06/14/07
Greed fighting mega-greed - who cares... (NT)  nottheusual1 | 06/14/07
RUB RAM  D. T. Schmitz | 06/14/07
Mass Stupidity  gofermatch | 06/15/07
Take these cases to a neutral jurisdiction!  nolaexperience | 06/15/07
This is where HARDWARE DRM  Old Timer 8080 | 06/15/07
We already do it voluntarily  Mike Hunt | 06/15/07
Hardware DRM ?  oldfellow | 06/15/07
thank god almighty  mindilator@... | 06/18/07
self-incimirnation?  bgk | 06/18/07
A Judge?  dutch6@... | 06/18/07
Anyone have some White-Out??  Timpraetor | 06/18/07
Land of the Free  wizardb@... | 06/18/07
Ya?  Mike Hunt | 06/19/07
Unplug the RAM and hand it over  dmawby@... | 06/18/07
Gee yer honor, the data was there before we unplugged 'em  Timpraetor | 06/18/07
Privacy  chaz15 | 06/18/07
that's it exactly  mindilator@... | 06/18/07
If Torrentspy..  fabioq@... | 06/18/07
ILLEGAL COPYING  malcolmlongworth@... | 06/18/07
You are as much to blame, really  Mike Hunt | 06/19/07
New server needed  tech_ed@... | 06/18/07
Easy Enough...  Timpraetor | 06/18/07
Torrent Spy Ruling  kevin1957@... | 06/19/07
Torrent Spy Ruling  kevin1957@... | 06/19/07
Ummmm,......  Mike Hunt | 06/19/07
Did anybody really read the ruling?  alphawiz | 06/19/07
Close  Mike Hunt | 06/19/07
Seems pretty simple to circumvent  Yamust B. Kiddingme | 06/21/07
But Torrentspy isn't doing anything wrong.  mames1701 | 06/19/07
Well, there goes Bit Torrents  The Masked Villain | 06/21/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here