On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 39:
Next »
Let's see, maybe we should start with companies that produce shoddy
software, resulting in millions of vulnerabilities, and untold damages to the industry. We also need categories for companies that refuse to comply with standards, and create no end of problems for people like, say, web designers.

Where should we start? What is the first company that might be guilty of this? Should we bar them from doing business?

After we have taken care of the problem companies, then we can start on the individuals.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 05/24/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Let's see, maybe we should start with companies that produce shoddy  DonnieBoy | 05/24/07
Well, that would be like  John Zern | 05/24/07
lets try that again  John Zern | 05/24/07
Microsoft should revoke certs from incompetent IT Pros  lamp299 | 05/25/07
Hey I agree! Let's take out the first company to reach 100 vulnerabilities  georgeou | 05/26/07
Apples and Oranges again  Suicida| | 05/27/07
Another thing, this sounds like a company, where many of the projects have  DonnieBoy | 05/24/07
Yeah., Sounds like they're  John Zern | 05/24/07
bad products  kckn4fun | 05/25/07
I'd love to kick them out  jfp | 05/24/07
degrees?  BobF_z | 05/25/07
to degree or not to degree---?  kckn4fun | 05/25/07
Value of a Degree?  Marty R. Milette | 05/25/07
Self policing is never effective  kmatzen@... | 05/24/07
UK Microsoft: Label incompetent IT pros  Loverock Davidson | 05/24/07
How about suing companies for malpractice?  kraterz | 05/24/07
There are already laws...  rapson | 05/25/07
Yeah, socialism  Omch'Ar | 05/24/07
Name one that does work  ibabadur1 | 05/25/07
You're almost there  Omch'Ar | 05/25/07
So does capitalism.  HypnoToad72 | 05/26/07
Are they crazy?  BobF_z | 05/25/07
I agree with the idea, but...  roberto_maietta@... | 05/25/07
Where do we lay the blame?  ebudae@... | 05/25/07
Also  BobF_z | 05/25/07
All too true on both posts  John Zern | 05/25/07
A Microsoft-proposed IT professional organisation...  Henry Miller | 05/25/07
Maybe...  rapson | 05/25/07
You have a point.  Henry Miller | 05/25/07
Wish list for MS: Tax on Developers  scott1329 | 05/25/07
When will we audit management  Silent Observer | 05/25/07
I'd love to kick you out  Boot_Agnostic | 05/25/07
You cant compare this to malpractice  Been_Done_Before | 05/25/07
Interesting idea  zkiwi | 05/25/07
Actually, MS does hold their developers responsible with SDL  georgeou | 05/26/07
I'm not sure what you call an exploit  zkiwi | 05/26/07
Problem is that most of these MASSIVE failures come from outsourcing firms  georgeou | 05/26/07
*DING* *DING* *DING* *DING* *DING* We have a winner!!  HypnoToad72 | 05/26/07
Who in their right mind employs  mrjonno | 05/29/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here