Wired but not Web 2.0? That's normal, study says

TalkBack 1 of 10:

Next »

• Thread View
• Flat View

Article is Way Off

The two items that define Web 2.0 are WikiPedia and Google. I seriously doubt anyone surfing the web doesn't know about both. RSS will come of course but this article gets two thumbs way down. What is its purpose. Are readers looking to slow the pace of change?

Or is this an attempt to lull US Citizens into allowing the sale of broadband from TV spectrum. Get Behind US Satan. The greatest commons of all history should not be privatized. See this Web 2.0 commons as the mechanism the will make the USA economically dominant for 1000 years. See also that TV spectrum should be used for TV like things - like the Public Broadcasting now known as YouTube. There is a reason for Times Person of the Year.

Rise US Citizens - do not let TV spectrum so valuable for our economic, educational and safety be privatized. Lets keep this spectrum from the corporations who would have it.

Posted by: mighetto   Posted on: 05/07/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Get top-ranked Novell support for Red Hat at 50% less Novell A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex, it's more reliable. ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now