On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 43:
Next »
« Previous
Umm...it's a matter of time before - - -
You see, the internet will become some sort of 'neural net' in the next few years.

You will see MUCH more VPN connections between users without the use of centralized servers.

How then will the DMCA have any bite?

And sooner or later, someone WILL create a killer program that will accomplish just that.

And the MPAA/RIAA can't stick their noses into anything - only the courts could - MAYBE.

If congress would pass laws that STOP the extreme corporate greed, then problems would subside.

What I am saying is this: Abolish ALL copyright laws and start over. Force the expiration of all copyrights to 3-4 years after their creation. And NO cross conversion to patents. No patenting of things that should have been copyrighted.

This would fix Sooooooooooo many problems.

The world will become very stagnant if the current laws are kept in place. Original creativity, sooner or later, will stop growing. There are just so many ideas that can be original before becoming derivitive works.

Here's one more thought:

The 'D' in DMCA means digital.
Let's convert everything into analog then the DMCA won't apply.

The internet and everything about it, on it, and in it should be free - a free exchange if information, just as it was intended.

And hold the infringer responsible for the infringement, not the hosting site - the authors should police their own material, not make others do their dirty work for them.
Posted by: Zolar   Posted on: 03/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

"Directly"  Jack-Booted EULA | 03/13/07
Directly means  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/07
Does that include  Jack-Booted EULA | 03/13/07
no...  Stuka | 03/13/07
The courts disagree with you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/07
Different case  voska | 03/14/07
But there's a difference.  Henaway | 03/14/07
True, but not the same  jc williams | 03/14/07
Sorry - directly MEANS directly  macbill | 03/14/07
Should be fun to watch  tic swayback | 03/13/07
agreed, absolutely!!  mdsmedia | 03/13/07
Only if I get to write the new one.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/07
Oh great  tic swayback | 03/14/07
Yeah, right....  Henrik Moller | 03/13/07
YouTube's fate rests on decade-old copyright law  Loverock Davidson | 03/13/07
yeah, good one Lovey  mdsmedia | 03/13/07
The Literal interpretation of the DMCA...  mdsmedia | 03/13/07
Once YouTube goes, the house of cards will hopefully follow  Scrat | 03/14/07
Cards like...  tic swayback | 03/14/07
I don't want YOUR internet!  macbill | 03/14/07
There will be no winners.  Raymond Danner | 03/14/07
Umm...it's a matter of time before - - -  Zolar | 03/14/07
Forgot - about the old music  Zolar | 03/14/07
Hit the nail on the head ...  Henaway | 03/14/07
Who should do the police work?  golfnutzgg@... | 03/14/07
By The Same Token  Mr_Wizard | 03/14/07
Tracking would satisfy  plutes | 03/14/07
Sooner or later.and it might be now...  epcraig | 03/14/07
There's no doubt about that  macbill | 03/14/07
I respectfully disagree.  Raymond Danner | 03/14/07
DMCA was never a good law  jdubow@... | 03/14/07
Unbalanced laws, infinite copyright...  Raymond Danner | 03/14/07
If only the DMCA was "nearly antique"...  Resuna | 03/14/07
How is this different?  steeleweed | 03/14/07
It's all short-sighted...  chas_2 | 03/14/07
Our Cultural Heritage is at Stake here  YellowbirdTwo | 03/14/07
I concur  sgo7 | 03/14/07
Money Opposes Merit  bcroner | 03/14/07
Here's a chance for Google to prove its non-evilness  plutes | 03/14/07
It really boggles the mind....  staygroovy | 03/15/07
YouTube charging?  billschwenke@... | 03/15/07
Viacom vs YouTube  PCH #1 | 03/15/07
The laws need fixing, and not just for companies  Boot_Agnostic | 03/24/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Meet Doc