On BNET: Vote: How will Apple blow it?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 30 of 43:
Next »
« Previous
I respectfully disagree.
macbill inscribed:
The fair use doctrine allows legitimate use of limited portions for specific purposes - home entertainment is not one of those purposes.

Dang, man . . . way to quote the RIAA when they were going after the manufacturers of the cassette recorder! (an effort that failed miserably)

Fair-use doctrine also allows /private/ use of recordings in another media. You're not allowed to give it away. This being said, there is an issue here, but it is solvable by one means: Education of users. Watermarking (invisible, inaudible or not) is no guarantee. License-based WMV and WMA just infuriate legitimate users, should they ever lose those backed-up licenses (or get stung by licenses that are, in reality, malware!).

Education of users, in what should and should not be shared, is a first step. One that has never been actually pursued on a large scale.

I'm a computer consultant who's logged thousands of hours cleaning up after malware. Some of that malware (and this is according to members of the black-hat hacker community) was commissioned by the RIAA to discredit KaZaA and similar systems. I still remember seeing more than one message on KaZaA's chat system showing that a specific person had been paid tens of thousands of dollars by the RIAA to code malware to be distributed on KaZaA. This only worked because KaZaA, unlike modern P2P systems, didn't do MD5 hashing of the content.

Do I believe that all such claims were literal truth? No. However, this was during the period that the RIAA was pulling out all the stops in an effort to (by their own words) poison the P2P systems out of business.

I see both sides at fault here. Viacom for trying to pass responsibility onto YouTube for enforcement, and YouTube for having allowed uploaders to toss copyrighted material up without proper licensing.

I have said it before, and I will say it again: No matter who wins in court, everyone will lose.
Posted by: Raymond Danner   Posted on: 03/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

"Directly"  Jack-Booted EULA | 03/13/07
Directly means  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/07
Does that include  Jack-Booted EULA | 03/13/07
no...  Stuka | 03/13/07
The courts disagree with you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/07
Different case  voska | 03/14/07
But there's a difference.  Henaway | 03/14/07
True, but not the same  jc williams | 03/14/07
Sorry - directly MEANS directly  macbill | 03/14/07
Should be fun to watch  tic swayback | 03/13/07
agreed, absolutely!!  mdsmedia | 03/13/07
Only if I get to write the new one.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/13/07
Oh great  tic swayback | 03/14/07
Yeah, right....  Henrik Moller | 03/13/07
YouTube's fate rests on decade-old copyright law  Loverock Davidson | 03/13/07
yeah, good one Lovey  mdsmedia | 03/13/07
The Literal interpretation of the DMCA...  mdsmedia | 03/13/07
Once YouTube goes, the house of cards will hopefully follow  Scrat | 03/14/07
Cards like...  tic swayback | 03/14/07
I don't want YOUR internet!  macbill | 03/14/07
There will be no winners.  Raymond Danner | 03/14/07
Umm...it's a matter of time before - - -  Zolar | 03/14/07
Forgot - about the old music  Zolar | 03/14/07
Hit the nail on the head ...  Henaway | 03/14/07
Who should do the police work?  golfnutzgg@... | 03/14/07
By The Same Token  Mr_Wizard | 03/14/07
Tracking would satisfy  plutes | 03/14/07
Sooner or later.and it might be now...  epcraig | 03/14/07
There's no doubt about that  macbill | 03/14/07
I respectfully disagree.  Raymond Danner | 03/14/07
DMCA was never a good law  jdubow@... | 03/14/07
Unbalanced laws, infinite copyright...  Raymond Danner | 03/14/07
If only the DMCA was "nearly antique"...  Resuna | 03/14/07
How is this different?  steeleweed | 03/14/07
It's all short-sighted...  chas_2 | 03/14/07
Our Cultural Heritage is at Stake here  YellowbirdTwo | 03/14/07
I concur  sgo7 | 03/14/07
Money Opposes Merit  bcroner | 03/14/07
Here's a chance for Google to prove its non-evilness  plutes | 03/14/07
It really boggles the mind....  staygroovy | 03/15/07
YouTube charging?  billschwenke@... | 03/15/07
Viacom vs YouTube  PCH #1 | 03/15/07
The laws need fixing, and not just for companies  Boot_Agnostic | 03/24/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc