On CNET: Update software safe and spyware free
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 12:
Next »
« Previous
Oh, puh-leaze!!
"Amazon in its response said IBM never should have earned the patents in question because they were not novel and nonobvious,"

And that STUPID one-click patent is?!!!!!

Oh, puh-leaze! Gimme a break. Amazon's patents are no better. That one-click thing is total rubbish - I've read it and it's nothing more than using a lot of words to disguise the fact that they're patenting the obvious.
Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 12/16/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Transparent litigation ploy  mighetto | 12/15/06
Yawn. Pleas don't say  John Zern | 12/15/06
Wow  Patrick Jones | 12/18/06
Thats what I got from it man...  doas777 | 12/21/06
IBM & Motorolla stole my...  Mix Coke | 12/15/06
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 12/15/06
Oh, puh-leaze!!  CobraA1 | 12/16/06
Irony prevails!  joemartn | 12/17/06
If Amazon's patents are valid, then so do IBM's  joemartn | 12/16/06
my confidential sources told me that  Linux Geek | 12/18/06
Amazon's counter suit could be very clever.  markheyes | 12/18/06
perhaps...  doas777 | 12/21/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and