On mySimon: Backpacker Magazine Award Winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 20 of 28:
Next »
« Previous
Yeah, you're right, I must be stupid
Like I said before: Banks are regulated in part by the government, and rules can and will be added to force banks to make the data secure. Plus why should I withdrawl my money, my accounts are FDIC insured.

Google as a search company will never be forced to adhere to any legal requirements regarding breech and loss of information, and you'll have to agree with their EULA that I'm sure states thay are not responsible for any loss of data.

As for why I must be stupid, I trust the security of my own computer MUCH MUCH more then I do Google's, so since they are professionals, I must have gaping holes in my security where they have none.

By the way: Some clerk walked out of Los Alamos with highly secure nuke info. What make you think some clerk isn't walking out of Google with your private info right now? Maybe he'll walk out with confidential financial info from some corporation next week...
Posted by: John Zern   Posted on: 11/09/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Yes, just like we trust banks to keep our money, we will trust service  DonnieBoy | 11/07/06
It's speed more than security  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
For some applications, there is already very little difference, for others,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
So, let me get this straight  John Zern | 11/08/06
Web applications will NEVER be the resource hog that Vista is, but sure,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
eventually is the key word here  April May | 11/08/06
For many, applications, the infrastructure is here now. Take  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Sorry, I don't buy it....  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/08/06
You had better RUN to your bank right now and withdraw ALL of your money.  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You miss the point  John Zern | 11/08/06
Wow, since when did Governnent control and insurance solve all porblems in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
That's just not accurate  April May | 11/08/06
You seem to think that everyone with a digital camara wants to spend hours  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The bank analogy just doesn't work  April May | 11/08/06
Just get over it, we trust companies all the time. Have you ever flown in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Leaky abstraction  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
You have given reasons for caching data locally, but NO reason for not  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You may have answered your own question.  John Zern | 11/08/06
Do you not realize that you banking information is also online???  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Yeah, you're right, I must be stupid  John Zern | 11/09/06
But how will they move the data?  April May | 11/08/06
I don't suppose you ever heard of the technology called "encryption". Do  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Well,  April May | 11/08/06
It was in the news recently that Google is working on the offline problem,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The data is not accurate  Linux User 1 | 11/08/06
Google wants data in the cloud, not on the desktop  Loverock Davidson | 11/08/06
Who cares where Google wants my data.  osreinstall | 11/08/06
I see Big Brother's hand at work... up Google's arse.  Mr. Roboto | 11/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here