On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 28:
Next »
« Previous
eventually is the key word here
I can't see Google interesting many businesses at this point beyond some niche usage. It's just not time for this paradigm shift quite yet, the speed is still lacking and the apps are completely lacking when it comes to enterprise IT.
Eventually web stores will be the backend for a lot of companies but it won't be just Google. There will be hundreds of players. I'm not sure how the broadband speeds will outpace the competition on the web over time? Any thoughts on that? Surely with all the big players putting out web offerings, where will the bandwidth come from to support the web 2.0 bubble.As internet video is moved more and more into businesses and the mainstream and terabytes of data is being moved around routinely?
Posted by: April May   Posted on: 11/08/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Yes, just like we trust banks to keep our money, we will trust service  DonnieBoy | 11/07/06
It's speed more than security  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
For some applications, there is already very little difference, for others,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
So, let me get this straight  John Zern | 11/08/06
Web applications will NEVER be the resource hog that Vista is, but sure,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
eventually is the key word here  April May | 11/08/06
For many, applications, the infrastructure is here now. Take  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Sorry, I don't buy it....  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/08/06
You had better RUN to your bank right now and withdraw ALL of your money.  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You miss the point  John Zern | 11/08/06
Wow, since when did Governnent control and insurance solve all porblems in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
That's just not accurate  April May | 11/08/06
You seem to think that everyone with a digital camara wants to spend hours  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The bank analogy just doesn't work  April May | 11/08/06
Just get over it, we trust companies all the time. Have you ever flown in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Leaky abstraction  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
You have given reasons for caching data locally, but NO reason for not  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You may have answered your own question.  John Zern | 11/08/06
Do you not realize that you banking information is also online???  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Yeah, you're right, I must be stupid  John Zern | 11/09/06
But how will they move the data?  April May | 11/08/06
I don't suppose you ever heard of the technology called "encryption". Do  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Well,  April May | 11/08/06
It was in the news recently that Google is working on the offline problem,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The data is not accurate  Linux User 1 | 11/08/06
Google wants data in the cloud, not on the desktop  Loverock Davidson | 11/08/06
Who cares where Google wants my data.  osreinstall | 11/08/06
I see Big Brother's hand at work... up Google's arse.  Mr. Roboto | 11/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads