On The Insider: James Van Der Beek Files for Divorce
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 28:
Next »
« Previous
You have given reasons for caching data locally, but NO reason for not
keeping it online as well, where you will then be able to access it from any computer or device connected to the net. Also, remember that the speeds connecting us to the net are going up as we speak. Some applications may not be vialble as online apps for a few years, as back end processing power and network speeds ramp up. There is an all out war going on to add back end processing power and bandwidth. Does anybody know the average number of servers brought online by Google every day?

And, do not forget that future web applications will be able to tap in to the power of super computers on the back end and terabytes of data, with 10x more bandwidth than we have right now. Future web applications will be able to do a lot of things that desktop applications can not do right now.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 11/08/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Yes, just like we trust banks to keep our money, we will trust service  DonnieBoy | 11/07/06
It's speed more than security  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
For some applications, there is already very little difference, for others,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
So, let me get this straight  John Zern | 11/08/06
Web applications will NEVER be the resource hog that Vista is, but sure,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
eventually is the key word here  April May | 11/08/06
For many, applications, the infrastructure is here now. Take  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Sorry, I don't buy it....  wjkahlssmd@... | 11/08/06
You had better RUN to your bank right now and withdraw ALL of your money.  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You miss the point  John Zern | 11/08/06
Wow, since when did Governnent control and insurance solve all porblems in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
That's just not accurate  April May | 11/08/06
You seem to think that everyone with a digital camara wants to spend hours  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The bank analogy just doesn't work  April May | 11/08/06
Just get over it, we trust companies all the time. Have you ever flown in  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Leaky abstraction  LordLiverpool | 11/08/06
You have given reasons for caching data locally, but NO reason for not  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
You may have answered your own question.  John Zern | 11/08/06
Do you not realize that you banking information is also online???  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Yeah, you're right, I must be stupid  John Zern | 11/09/06
But how will they move the data?  April May | 11/08/06
I don't suppose you ever heard of the technology called "encryption". Do  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
Well,  April May | 11/08/06
It was in the news recently that Google is working on the offline problem,  DonnieBoy | 11/08/06
The data is not accurate  Linux User 1 | 11/08/06
Google wants data in the cloud, not on the desktop  Loverock Davidson | 11/08/06
Who cares where Google wants my data.  osreinstall | 11/08/06
I see Big Brother's hand at work... up Google's arse.  Mr. Roboto | 11/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here