On mySimon: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 69:
Next »
« Previous
Let's agree on this...
The U.N. has always had problems with members refusing to pay the assessment levied upon them under the United Nations Charter. But the most significant refusal in recent times has been that of the U.S. For a number of years, the U.S. Congress refused to authorize payment of the U.S. dues, in order to force U.N. compliance with U.S. wishes, as well as a reduction in the U.S. assessment.

After prolonged negotiations, the U.S. and the U.N. negotiated an agreement whereby the United States would pay a large part of the money it owes, and in exchange the UN would reduce the assessment rate ceiling from 25% to 22%. The reduction in the assessment rate ceiling was among the reforms contained in the 1999 Helms-Biden legislation, which links payment of $926 million in U.S. arrears to the UN and other international organizations to a series of reform benchmarks.

U.S. arrears to the UN currently total over $1.3 billion. Of this, $612 million is payable under Helms-Biden. The remaining $700 million result from various legislative and policy withholdings; at present, there are no plans to pay these amounts.

Under Helms-Biden, the U.S. paid $100 million in arrears to the UN in December 1999; release of the next $582 million awaits a legislative revision to Helms-Biden, necessary because the benchmark requiring a 25 percent peacekeeping assessment rate ceiling was not quite achieved. The U.S. also seeks elimination of the legislated 25 percent cap on U.S. peacekeeping payments in effect since 1995, which continues to generate additional U.N. arrears. Of the final $244 million under Helms-Biden, $30 million is payable to the U.N. and $214 million to other international organizations.

The table summarizing this is on

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_the_United_Nations
Posted by: Oreamnos_americanus   Posted on: 11/01/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Let me get this straight...  ShadeTree | 10/31/06
You got it  Bill4 | 10/31/06
UN is useless  ITTech001 | 10/31/06
Ironic  ITTech001 | 10/31/06
Most popular sport in America  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Listen buddy....  techboy_z | 10/31/06
Very partiotic, no doubt; still no less wrong  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
No less wrong because it's not wrong at all.  techboy_z | 10/31/06
throwing around epithets  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Few inaccuracies in the previous post, too  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
You see...  rapson | 10/31/06
I beg to differ  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Ahem- now that's ridiculous Predrag...  banquo79 | 10/31/06
What Predrag also does not mention  John Zern | 10/31/06
Let's agree on this...  banquo79 | 10/31/06
Excellent post  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Let's agree on this...  Oreamnos_americanus | 11/01/06
You need to reinvestigate  techboy_z | 10/31/06
Not so sure, as citations are missing  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Ironic, isn't it, these EU countries  John Zern | 10/31/06
Almost...  techboy_z | 10/31/06
Darfur? Oil-for-Food???  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Hey, look again...and stop lying.  techboy_z | 10/31/06
For your info.  ShadeTree | 11/01/06
It was going well until you hopped in.  I am Gorby | 11/01/06
Seconded.  HypnoToad | 10/31/06
China and people  Linux User 1 | 10/31/06
This is about making Big Boys Cry  mighetto | 10/31/06
Hey look: Frank's bashing MS and Bill Gates!!!  John Zern | 10/31/06
And note how...  rapson | 10/31/06
Bluntly stated, the UN must stay out of  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/31/06
How about.....  seosamh_z | 10/31/06
Please share with us one good thing they ...  ShadeTree | 10/31/06
UNICEF  seosamh_z | 10/31/06
No thanks.  techboy_z | 10/31/06
Say what?????  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/31/06
Say this...  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/31/06
What happened, No_Ax?  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Buwahahaha  Oreamnos_americanus | 11/01/06
Trying reading  seosamh_z | 10/31/06
Yes  Tiggster | 10/31/06
Unfortunately you are correct.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/31/06
Do Not Get Out Of The U.N.  iwasbannedatci | 10/31/06
It wouldn't matter....  techboy_z | 11/01/06
The US is a permanent member of the UN Security Council.  B.O.F.H. | 10/31/06
Must have been living under a rock...  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Listing that they were given a controversial ...  ShadeTree | 10/31/06
Controversial???  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
what about its middle east policy?  Tiggster | 10/31/06
60 years ago maybe, but not today.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/31/06
Actually, today, more than ever...  Predrag Vasic | 10/31/06
Agreed...lets talk education  banquo79 | 10/31/06
To Predrag and banquo79....  techboy_z | 10/31/06
Predrag, how about looking at it from a different perspective?  thelemite | 11/01/06
Laughable!  ShadeTree | 11/01/06
Hey Thelemite, a lot of countries...  I am Gorby | 11/01/06
Gorby......  thelemite | 11/02/06
Even thoug the US is a member?  B.O.F.H. | 10/31/06
so anything that offends, whether true or not, is illegal? that goes  wessonjoe | 10/31/06
Your statement is horrid, your point correct.  banquo79 | 10/31/06
Talk about "Hypocritical"  John Zern | 10/31/06
I noticed that too  rapson | 10/31/06
To answer the Irish Delegate  wolf_z | 10/31/06
I could go for that  fmcgowan | 10/31/06
Improvement ?  perryroyce@... | 10/31/06
The best lies...  multanihl | 10/31/06
Don't sweat it.  multanihl | 10/31/06
Actually, world could blast U.N. for its laxed approach to China  Boot_Agnostic | 11/05/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here