On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 32:
Next »
« Previous
Patent System Is Broken - Lawyers Win Not Us
As someone who is currently involved in software patent litigation (we are s s/w shop that is being sued), I can attest that the system is supremely broken. Here are just a few things that you "patents protect inventor" posters might want to consider:
1) A typical patent infringement case costs 700K to litigate - the cost of being found innocent is too high for most small to medium sized-companies even if you are right
2) The patent system has almost no way for normal people to submit the body of prior work (called prior art) that would make a patent seem ridiculous. Once the patent paper is filed, the lawyers go and win.
3) The PTO charter does not extend into the court system. So, you will find that patent owners have numerous ways to hide or mischaracterize facts to their advantadge.
4) software should be copyrighted not patented. Like a picture or a painting. There is no reason why I can't use software to build _another_ web browser, another operating system, another spreadsheet, another zip utility, another web service, as long as it doesn't look exactly like yours. A patent prevents you from making something that functions essentially the same as yours.
5) If you insist on having software patents, then make the owner pay if they lose in court. That atleast would remove the unfair advantadge.

I could go on -- s/w patents do not work. The EU recently stopped issuing them. We should follow their lead.
Posted by: codesaildrink   Posted on: 10/31/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

bad PR for IBM  Linux Geek | 10/23/06
It will be in certain communities  Tim Patterson | 10/23/06
Not really...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
Re: Not really...  none none | 10/23/06
GPL Patents  x42 | 10/23/06
Start here Mr. Clueless.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/24/06
Re: Start here Mr. Clueless.  none none | 10/24/06
IBM suing for Brazillions of dollars?  Suicida| | 10/23/06
Yawn  John L. Ries | 10/23/06
Agreed  Tim Patterson | 10/23/06
You might enjoy this....  bportlock | 10/23/06
The patents deal with intellectual property issues ranging from  swoopee | 10/23/06
Ridiculous  the_seb | 10/23/06
You would have  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
Reading instead of Talking  x42 | 10/23/06
Take that Richard  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/24/06
Live by the silly patent, ...  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/23/06
Say WHAT?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/23/06
No Ax - try stating FACTS for a change  bportlock | 10/23/06
Aorry but BZZZZT...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/24/06
Re: Live by the silly patent, ...  none none | 10/23/06
Huzzah - its about time; Next is Microsoft  mighetto | 10/23/06
Unless your product is FOSS ...  bportlock | 10/23/06
Does this mean that ...  phburks | 10/23/06
why not patents  cowpoke | 10/23/06
Re: why not patents  none none | 10/23/06
Patent System Is Broken - Lawyers Win Not Us  codesaildrink | 10/31/06
IBM taking over the world as other big rich people, the haves and the have  vicsflick | 10/31/06
All patent laws must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 10/23/06
...NOT!  Wolfie2K3 | 10/24/06
What a Christmas Scenario!  Neutrodyne | 10/31/06
IBM: Amazon violates our patents  rl.forbes@... | 10/31/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here