Congress mulls slew of Net-sex rules

TalkBack 17 of 18:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Wow... i mean.. wow.. this is truely pathetic.

Restrict the rights of all to protect the few.. ya know the ones that cant vote or sign contracts? Pfft whatever. Parents pay attention to your kids, teachers look out for abuse.. this is what worked in the past and what does work now. Social responsibility not social censorship.

If the zombie voters would stop electing these idiots, the USA would be a much better off.

The internet is global and censorship of an already restricted area(meaning you have to pay to access it) is stupid. I can see libraries and schools doing this and thats fine, but forcing this on everyone is wrong.

Hitler was able to put Germany on lock down overnight because of fear.. lets not allow our goverment to do the same over time.

Posted by: Been_Done_Before   Posted on: 06/28/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Infrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now