On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 46 of 48:
Next »
« Previous
I recently posted this elsewhere...
....but it's equally relevant to films - though much more of a problem for the film industry.

The notion of digital rights management is never going to work, IMO.
Ultimately, you HAVE to convert to audio - the human brain doesn't accept direct digital input. *smile* ....... Yet ... *eek*

People happily accept the inevitable slight decrease in quality caused by the conversion to the extremely compact mp3 format.

Play your music and re-record the audio output to convert back to digital in a file form that is free of any restraints.
With a Pro sound-card (high-quality converters) the consequent quality loss of the double-conversion is very small indeed.
....and you can do WTF you like with it, copy it to play on "anything." *top*

....so we are faced with a choice .....
Buy their DRM product at an extortionate price and suffer all the restrictions and problems of future obsolescence of format/player/License
- OR -
Rip-and-Burn via audio.
AFAIK, this loophole is unpluggable.
I was in the studio business while the industry was (wasting huge amounts of money and everybody's time) trying to create an "audio-based DRM type protection"
This was the era of panic caused by the invention of audio cassettes and - much later, the first CD's
The results of the various audio-based protection attempts were judged utterly atrocious by the Association Of Professional Sound Engineers* for the dire audio consequences clearly audible at the official demonstration of the proposed system.
Strangely, ( *razz* ) the unanimous horror of the audiophiles wasn't shared by any of the assembled record-company people, who continued to talk up their proposals even as the audio experts almost vomited in the aisles.
Indeed, very few accountants - oops....record execs .... saw/heard anything wrong with the protection at all and but for the the wholesale rejection by anyone with functional hearing - including the very artistes whose music this was going to "protect" - we WOULD have been had this atrocity inflicted upon us!!

So now they are wasting money (YOURS! *mad* ) on developing a system which has an inherent work-around - quite apart from what any hackers/crackers may achieve in the future.

The truth is - the days of the big record companies are over. For ever.

In the past, an artiste had to create and demo their work and persuade a record-company to invest a large sum of money to finance the cost of professional recording, promoting and plugging.
These days musicians are a lot more tech-savvy with regard to recording and the capabilities of quite cheap, easy to use software can rival the product of a pro-studio.
.... if everyone in your band has cloth-ears then you'll need a Producer to keep you on track and give the product "audio gloss" but there are plenty of those guys around these days.

As for promotion/sales/distribution .... Gnarles Barkly and now Ms Horne have shown that the internet can already be all you need.
...Oh..... you'll need some talent too, of course *lol* (...probably *wink* )

How the artiste themselves protect their undeniable right to payment for their efforts is another closely related question of course, but whichever and however the long established role of the record companies is inevitably over.
DRM for music is their desperate attempt to hang on to their income and industry control, but their day is over.
They're obsolete in their present form, because their niche has been filled in and bypassed.

Meanwhile, we're prolly looking at another decade of DRM attempts with all its frustrations, inconvenience (to us) and costs (to us). *mad*

DRM ...... Desperate Record Moguls
[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/5041684.stm] UK ministers demand clear labelling [/url]
[url=http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=2488740-54f1197672643c754bf0ce19a16d0169-bf&s=5&fs=0] Problems of DRM [/url]
Posted by: Castanet   Posted on: 06/23/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well what did they expect him to do?  mobrien_12@... | 06/22/06
Now THAT takes a pair!  bourgtai | 06/22/06
Just don't break the law  tic swayback | 06/23/06
Message has been deleted.  TheRealPauper | 06/23/06
Are cars made specifically for murder?  bourgtai | 06/23/06
Depends what you're looking for  voska | 06/23/06
Google doesn't have a torrent directory.  bourgtai | 06/23/06
Google' Adobe.torrent'  s_gamgee | 06/24/06
I normally don't repost my own messages verbatim, but...  bourgtai | 06/24/06
Clueless  TheRealPauper | 06/27/06
Intelligence obviously isn't your strongest point  Artstar | 06/23/06
It's marketability, then, that's the problem?  bourgtai | 06/23/06
0 x 25,000 is still 0  voska | 06/23/06
You sir, are assuming that college students are frugal.  bourgtai | 06/23/06
But stupidity in money doesn't automatically bring it to piracy  Artstar | 06/23/06
I downloaded X2 and yet that didn't stop me ...  Artstar | 06/23/06
If you consider yourself to be part of the many,  bourgtai | 06/23/06
As usual, you missed the point  Artstar | 06/23/06
Excuse me  Sackaguano | 06/26/06
How do you know they would've bought the movie anyway?  DawGone | 06/24/06
Maybe you don't have these where you live...  bourgtai | 06/24/06
Do you work for the MPAA?  CKayote | 06/28/06
Gee, what amazing numbers!  pirate? | 06/26/06
A fair bit of advice  Zayce | 06/27/06
are you a communist?  dougogd | 06/27/06
more info  dougogd | 06/27/06
So what?  HiRezL | 06/27/06
Can you say . . .  brian ansorge | 06/22/06
Do you think Mr. Anderson deliberatly broke the law?  Mr. Roboto | 06/23/06
money is a powerful motivator  toxicfreak | 06/23/06
Criminals are out for a buck  voska | 06/23/06
publish for profit.  Castanet | 06/23/06
Plenty of hackers have ideals...  Allstar_z | 06/26/06
But WHAT a nice shoot in that face  toxicfreak | 06/23/06
To The MPAA  BlackDiamond | 06/23/06
Another Power Corrupts B-School Example  nottheusual1 | 06/23/06
Mr. Anderson  petteyg359 | 06/23/06
MPAA deserves the best  Ole Man | 06/23/06
Yeah, the joke sure would be on them then, eh?  bourgtai | 06/23/06
Poor jump in logic  voska | 06/23/06
Exactly...  doas777 | 06/23/06
Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?  bourgtai | 06/23/06
You just refuse to acknowledge the honest cow-buying public eh?  Artstar | 06/24/06
Copyright law WAS fine...  Allstar_z | 06/26/06
MPAA  pirate? | 06/26/06
I recently posted this elsewhere...  Castanet | 06/23/06
Plugging the analog loophole  Mr_Dave | 06/24/06
Legal Means?  Gregory.J.Bradley@... | 06/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc