France backs down on iTunes DRM stance

TalkBack 13 of 58:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Original article, detailing the gutting and the selling out

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/28/french_drm_law_gets_.html

French DRM law gets ugly - protest May 7/2PM Place de la Bastille
A French proposal to change the way DRM is protected under law has been hijacked by entertainment companies and DRM vendors, and now promises to be one of the worst DRM laws in the world.

Previously, we wrote about the new French DRM law proposal, which held out the promise of being the first real attempt in the world to balance the legal protection of anti-user technology with the public interest. The activists of EUCD.info were concerned that the proposal was being hijacked by Universal/Vivendi, and this has come to pass.

EUCD.info's J?r?mie Zimmermann sent us the following, shocking account of how the French law went from being fair and balanced to being a one-sided gimme to entertainment companies and their arms-dealers. Don't miss the last paragraph, where J?r?mie announces EUCD.info's planned street-demonstration on May 7, at 2PM at the Place de la Bastille:

J?r?mie writes:

The French Senate will consider a major revision to its copyright law on May 4th, 9th and 10th. This law will implement the EUCD (the European equivalent of the DMCA) and change French author's rights and copright. It was voted by the first chamber on Feb 21st. This will be the final parliamentary step of the examination process, as a shortened "emergency procedure" was called on such a crucial subject.

The Senators are grouped by commissions. The "Commission of Cultural Affairs" that is in charge of this law voted for proposed amendments. They were made public a few days ago, and the "rapporteur" (overseer/project leader) of the law, M. Thiolli?re will defend them so they can be examined and voted during the public debates.

There's bad news for a revolutionary proposal (Article 7) that requires DRM makers to allow anyone to build interoperable technology. This was strenuously objected to by Apple and the US Department of Commerce but it was unanimously voted in at the last moment during the first meeting. Now it stands to be completely neutered:

* Gone is the requirement that anyone may ask a regular court of justice to force a DRM publisher to give information needed for interoperability. Now a "high regulation authority of technical measures" will have sole discretion as to whether this information will be available.

* Previously, "information needed for interoperability" covered "technical documentation and programming interfaces needed to obtain a copy in an open standard of the copyrighted work, along with its legal information." Now this has been changed to "technical documentation and programming interfaces needed to obtain a protected copy of a copyrighted work." But a "protected" version of the work can't be played back in a different player, which means interoperability won't be attained with this clause.

* Previously, the only condition for receiving information needed for interoperability was to meet the cost of logistics of delivering the information. Now, anyone wanting to build a player will have to take a license on "reasonable and non discriminatory conditions, and an appropriate fee." When using information attained under such a license, you will have to "respect the efficiency and integrity of the technical measure."

* DRM publishers can demand the retraction of publication of the source-code for interoperable, independent software, if it can prove that the source-code is "harmful to the security and the efficiency of the DRM."

* A clause put forward by EUCD.INFO (a organization that sprung from the Free Software Foundation France, and whose members helped write this article) has been radically altered. Previously, it stated that "A protocol, a file format, a method of transforming or encrypting information cannot be as such considered as a technical protection measure." Now it has been changed to "The components of a technical measure, like a protocol, a file format, a method of transforming information, are still protected by the article XY." This is an article in the existing French industrial property law describing what is patentable and what isn't. Thus, this clause now imposes software patents on France!

* Article 7bis has been struck. This Article required DRM publishers to disclose the source-code of their systems to special computer security division of the French Army in charge of military infrastructure.

This all shows that the "Cultural Commission" has failed utterly to come to grips with the social cost of legal protection for DRM -- free competition, protection of innovation, computer security, technological independence, privacy, etc. They've been captured by DRM lobbyists and the content industries. The new Article 7 follows the exact recommendations from Thomson an ex-French company that isn't worth much by now, except for its patents and some DRM project that Microsoft is interested in.

The French Libre Software associations are calling on their members and supporters to contact their Senators and tell them what's wrong with Article 7. STOPDRM.info, a new organization that organized flash-mobs in music superstore and in front of the stockholders-meeting of Vivendi-Universal will continue organizing events and protests. Feel free ask more info by contacting the members of the EUCD.INFO initiative and to come along the anti-DRM march starting at 2PM, Place de la Bastille, on May the 7th.

Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 05/02/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• Designing a Balanced Architecture With Oracle RAC and VERITAS Software for Linux Dell Introducing Oracle RAC into an IT infrastructure and using Linux as the ... Download Now
• Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now