On CBS MoneyWatch: 12 Tough Questions to Ask Your Parents
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 30:
Next »
« Previous
It COULD work
IF we could agree on what content (example "porn"), then it could just work. Say all porn sites MUST be registered in the .xxx domain - but they can keep their .com sites, just make them CNAMES and redirect to .xxx which would be EASILY caught by spam filters. You would also HAVE to "lock up" the IP addresses i.e. the .xxx domain MUST have an identifiable range of IPs. This could be accomplished by reserving an IPv6 range for these addresses (it would certainly give the ISPs a kick in the butt to go to IPv6).

Once you have isolated the .xxx domain, it would be a TRULY opt-in situation - something that EVERYONE wants today. NOW to define what content goes there . . .
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 03/20/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Are these pages suitable for children?  Nigel Johnstone | 03/17/06
Violence is ok, it;'s the human body thats's the problem.  jinko | 03/17/06
Let's take a great idea and screw it all up!!!  nucrash | 03/17/06
You know, that's one of the best ideas I've heard.  mobrien_12@... | 03/19/06
Only in America (land of the Puritan)  B.O.F.H. | 03/17/06
You're partially correct.  ac2_z | 03/17/06
You are also partially correct  Leria | 03/17/06
Dead on on both accounts  nucrash | 03/18/06
Violence is more acceptable than sex in America.  B.O.F.H. | 03/17/06
few things..  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/17/06
someone think of the children!!!  Maverick Hunter | 03/17/06
What about other areas that I don't like?  agramont@... | 03/17/06
From An Experienced Parent  jcj52436999 | 03/17/06
Censoring the idiots?  imetcyndi | 03/17/06
Sure.. let's get more regulations!!!  nucrash | 03/18/06
Critics of XXX Miss the Point  savatar | 03/18/06
I agree  fnash | 03/20/06
I need this  Desaunay | 03/19/06
TVs and PCs are not babysitters.  GaryN | 03/20/06
why do parents choose to not take responsibility?  B.O.F.H. | 03/19/06
because apparently..  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/19/06
Filtering products already work  Ich Bin Anonymous | 03/20/06
I am sure your missing the point  hglenni | 03/21/06
Governement Dilema  gt90v12 | 03/17/06
Interesting  mtabholt | 03/18/06
Don't hide behind your children  Nigel Johnstone | 03/18/06
It COULD work  Roger Ramjet | 03/20/06
Quite frankly... Bull****  test99939 | 03/20/06
Test no, guess yes?  Ynona | 03/21/06
Protecting Children is the PARENT'S responsibility!!!  atlantisjordan | 03/21/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here