On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 45:
Next »
« Previous
you don't see it huh?
I am going to assume (and I am sorry if my assumption is wrong) that you do not have any children. I am going to interpet this whole thing at face value. No one has to agree with me. But in my interpretation they are doing this to see just how much children A.) have access to adult websites and material through web searches. B.) How many times the websites that are found through search methods, such as google, are accessed. C.) They are not looking (at this point) for anything that would give them personal information on anyone. They are not asking for the IP address of the computer that accessed that website. They are not asking the ISP for the name of the person that accessed that website through them. They want a random sampling. In a way this is about crime prevention so it can be related to crime in a sense. If they wanted any of that kind of information I could seriously see getting angry about it. The same people who are so angry that the government would 'dare' to try and get this information are the same people who raise their voices when something bad happens and they say the goverment did nothing to stop it or try to get information to prevent it. That is all that I see this as at this point is a gathering of NON PERSONAL information to get a better idea of what children have access to and to find a way to make it harder for children to do it. I am the kind of parent that monitors her childrens internet habits as closely as I can but even I know that children will try to find a way around things. Children are like that and I do not know of any child that hasn't tried to pull the wool over their parents eyes. Of course laws can be better written. Or made easier to understand. But the only ay that I can see that happening is if you go out there and try to change these laws yourself. It takes time and patience to get these things done. And yes I do know what I am talking about. I am currently trying to go through that process myself and it is definately a long road. Nothing is perfect. You can't expect perfection.
Posted by: Shelendrea   Posted on: 01/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

what about....  SQLServer | 01/27/06
The influence would be minimal  Artstar | 01/27/06
You are totally right!!  rogueOne | 01/27/06
Let me get this straight!  ShadeTree | 01/27/06
hmmm  Shelendrea | 01/27/06
It's both  rapson | 01/27/06
Georing said it best. And Hitler-Bush knows it all too well.  Henrick Ericcson | 01/29/06
Amazed they didn't back off  Roger Ramjet | 01/27/06
Your comment would have more ...  ShadeTree | 01/27/06
It's not the law we're talking about. It's the  el1jones | 01/27/06
you don't see it huh?  Shelendrea | 01/27/06
wow  peaccedog@... | 01/27/06
Sure  Shelendrea | 01/27/06
Why?  fnash | 01/27/06
Simply put.....  peaccedog@... | 01/28/06
Be Careful on That ...  coffeenite | 01/27/06
it's not just  Shelendrea | 01/27/06
Hope You Read This  coffeenite | 01/27/06
Do you really think...  WhoDaMan | 01/27/06
ummmm.....  unoriginal_sin | 01/27/06
This is just too funny  Shelendrea | 01/27/06
Un huh  Henrick Ericcson | 01/29/06
Please Explain  WhoDaMan | 01/27/06
For the Children...  Henrick Ericcson | 01/29/06
Yeah but....  fnash | 01/27/06
You might want to brush up on the legal profession.  ShadeTree | 01/27/06
Whatever  fnash | 01/27/06
Google Lawsuit  tomwill98042 | 01/27/06
I'm honestly becoming scared!  I am Gorby | 01/27/06
Super scared...People were arrested for demonstrating in NY...  el1jones | 01/27/06
Remember when?  WhoDaMan | 01/27/06
The REAL Danger ...  coffeenite | 01/27/06
dangerous law  zijiang | 01/27/06
Double standard?  marbing@... | 01/27/06
the china thing is a different story  doh123 | 01/27/06
ok  Henrick Ericcson | 01/29/06
Don't get Google confused with Microsoft.  nomorems | 01/27/06
Lawyers  SGT_Spam | 01/27/06
See what I mean...  marbing@... | 01/27/06
Umm, TorontoGuy..  nomorems | 01/27/06
2 million terms is enough to do nothing  MIS Master | 01/27/06
Be Careful on That ...  coffeenite | 01/27/06
Government Phishing  steings@... | 01/30/06
The COPA was struck down as Unconstitutional  WiredGuy | 01/30/06
Uncle Sam wants to know about YOU!  cerrosur | 01/31/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc