On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 17:
Next »
Bring Back the Guillotine
If the American people do not wake up soon there will not even be a vestige of the Bill of Rights left to pass on to the next generation.

No branch of the federal government nor all of them combined have the right to alter the Bill of Rights without following the Amendment process and getting the consent of We the People!

Our out of control courts are supposed to administer the existing law and not legislate through interpretation!

Freedom of speech and the press are fundamental to a free society and that is why they are guaranteed in the "First" Amendment.

If American Federal Courts begin to rule in favor of French laws it is time to introduce would be American royalty to the guillotine.

Lovell v. City of Griffin SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 303 U.S. 444 Argued February 4, 1938 Decided March 28, 1938

The liberty of the press is not confined to newspapers and periodicals. It necessarily embraces pamphlets and leaflets. These indeed have been historic weapons in the defense of liberty, as the pamphlets of Thomas Paine and others in our own history abundantly attest. The press in its historic connotation comprehends every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion. What we have had recent occasion to say with respect to the vital importance of protecting this essential liberty from every sort of infringement need not be repeated. Near v. Minnesota, supra; Grosjean v. American Press Co., supra; De Jonge v. Oregon, supra.[note 2]

Whatever differences may exist about interpretations of the First Amendment, there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of that Amendment was to protect the free discussion of governmental affairs. This of course includes discussions of candidates, structures and forms of government, the manner in which government is operated or should be operated, and all such [384 U.S. 214, 219] matters relating to political processes. The Constitution specifically selected the press, which includes not only newspapers, books, and magazines, but also humble leaflets and circulars, see Lovell v. Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 , to play an important role in the discussion of public affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES v. ASSOCIATED PRESS et al. Nos. 57, 58 and 59. Argued Dec. 5, 6, 1944. Decided June 18, 1945

It would be strange indeed however if the grave concern for freedom of the press which prompted adoption of the First Amendment should be read as a command that the government was without power to protect that freedom. That Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society. Surely a command that the government itself shall not impede the free flow of ideas does not afford non-governmental combinations a refuge if they impose restraints upon that constitutionally guaranteed freedom. Freedom to publish means freedom for all and not for some. Freedom to publish is guaranteed by the Constitution, but freedom to combine to keep others from publishing is not. Freedom of the press from governmental interference under the First Amendment does not sanction repression of that freedom by private interests.

http://amendment10.tripod.com
Posted by: Repeal   Posted on: 01/12/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Bring Back the Guillotine  Repeal | 01/12/06
You mis-read what the 9th Circuit said.  ShadeTree | 01/13/06
freedom of speech  c-o-b | 01/16/06
AN Important Fact  Cayble | 01/17/06
AN Important Fact  c-o-b | 01/18/06
Check your viewership?  techboy_z | 01/13/06
Your opinion is very dangerous  el1jones | 01/13/06
Responsability.  mobrien_12@... | 01/13/06
You mean the US should not enforce its own laws overseas?  Bryn | 01/16/06
BIG problem  CobraA1 | 01/14/06
lets start with the American government  Bryn | 01/16/06
US Appeal Court (and ZDNet) accomplices  Michel Merlin | 01/16/06
Civil society and Civics Education  furcat | 01/16/06
The answer is simple  John L. Ries | 01/16/06
The answer is simple  c-o-b | 01/17/06
Sovereignty  teqjack@... | 01/16/06
No, not quite right?.  robertk2 | 01/17/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here