On TV.com: New TV Sex Symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 47 of 54:
Next »
« Previous
Nah, I'm still getting further ahead
You deserve no access to another persons computer because they aren't offering up freely, as MS is doing by offering the blogging service.

Where on earth did you ever get the idea that MS is offering their servers up freely?
6. MATERIALS YOU POST OR PROVIDE; COMMUNICATIONS MONITORING
For materials you post or otherwise provide to Microsoft related to the MSN Web Sites (a "Submission"), you grant Microsoft permission to (1) use, copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, reproduce, edit, modify, translate and reformat your Submission, each in connection with the MSN Web Sites, and (2) sublicense these rights, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. Microsoft will not pay you for your Submission. Microsoft may remove your Submission at any time. For each Submission, you represent that you have all rights necessary for you to make the grants in this section. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Microsoft may monitor your e-mail, or other electronic communications and may disclose such information in the event it has a good faith reason to believe it is necessary for purposes of ensuring your compliance with this Agreement, and protecting the rights, property, and interests of the Microsoft Parties or any customer of a Microsoft Party.

http://privacy2.msn.com/tou/en-us/default.aspx

It isn't MS's fault you didn't read the terms of use, the link is right there on the front page. Neither the private party nor MSN have offered "free" use of their servers yet only MS gets slammed for enforcing it?

MS is doing this solely to get in good with China, and as is, a good business move, but it all depends on which side of the line you stand.

No, I don't think there is more than one side here. No one, certainly not myself, believes that there was any reason for this other than the almighty $$$. No one died, no one was hurt, no one's rights were violated, and not many Americans can say they don't buy things that are made in China so this whole indignation is very hypocritical at best.
Posted by: NonZealot   Posted on: 01/04/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Microsoft censors Chinese blogger  Loverock Davidson | 01/04/06
Right, Google censored and we should ALL take a ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
MS is not the enemy here  Michael Kelly | 01/04/06
Go to bed with dogs,  bjbrock | 01/04/06
Not the enemy just following orders...  Nullifidian | 01/04/06
Ah, but if you are going to do business with the enemy ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Then don't buy MS products  NonZealot | 01/04/06
This Merle Haggard, "love 'em or leave 'em" ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
You are a selfish hypcrotic!  NonZealot | 01/04/06
Hey, chill out, NonZealot. I don't have all day to ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Oops, another question  NonZealot | 01/04/06
You think just because Bubba Clinton signed ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Hmmm  rafe01 | 01/04/06
Godwin's law has been replaced by OButterball's law  NonZealot | 01/04/06
Naw, that's already Dubya's Law:  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Then MSN should pull out of China  balsover | 01/05/06
Is MS for freedoms guaranteed  bjbrock | 01/04/06
You are confusing  NonZealot | 01/04/06
Obviously they are both.  bjbrock | 01/04/06
No confusion here.  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Interesting  rapson | 01/04/06
I look at the distinguishing  bjbrock | 01/04/06
Where is it written...  NonZealot | 01/04/06
I'm saying MS did not stand up  bjbrock | 01/04/06
Having trouble finding it in the constitution?  NonZealot | 01/04/06
Exactly, Carl:  Judas I. | 01/04/06
What is your point?  NonZealot | 01/04/06
Yes I would.  bjbrock | 01/04/06
MY point is:  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Neither of you replied to my question  NonZealot | 01/04/06
You asked for my point, I told you and I certainly ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Actually, thats a trick question  Monkey_MCSE | 01/04/06
OK...  rapson | 01/04/06
OK, so it's okay for MS to pen a plum contract ...  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Just to clarify a few things...  brble | 01/04/06
So, again, like other companies  Boot_Agnostic | 01/04/06
If in the US  Yehuda Mann | 01/04/06
But what does Chinese law say about a  Boot_Agnostic | 01/04/06
I believe I answered NZ's  bjbrock | 01/04/06
Yes, that you did. (NT)  Judas I. | 01/04/06
Conflict of Interest  Yehuda Mann | 01/04/06
You are violating my right to free speech unless...  NonZealot | 01/04/06
ah the letter not the spirit...  rafe01 | 01/04/06
Finally a ration response, thanks!  NonZealot | 01/04/06
..thank you...  rafe01 | 01/04/06
stop while you're ahead  Monkey_MCSE | 01/04/06
Nah, I'm still getting further ahead  NonZealot | 01/04/06
apparently you took the ...  Monkey_MCSE | 01/04/06
But people can't disagree logically  NonZealot | 01/04/06
except that....  rafe01 | 01/04/06
MS, China, etc.  jguyp725@... | 01/05/06
The new MS uniform.....  Middle of the Road | 01/05/06
Everyone's ranting about censorship by MSN...  btljooz | 01/06/06
Back it up and share it on Emule!  GreatInca | 04/19/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here