On mySimon: Victorias Secret Basic Instinct
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 27:
Next »
« Previous
Basic economics
Oh please, buying stocks is basic economics. The whole idea is that you buy a stock at what you believe to be below "fair value". The expectation is that it will rise to or above "fair value" at which point you sell and make a profit. If you've never heard of it before, it's called "buying low, selling high". It's, of course, always a risk because what you consider fair value is different from others. But at the same time, you're not playing roulette.

If anyone buys a stock without knowing this basic principle, they might as well be throwing money out the Windows =P

Ownership without knowledge (and no, installing Windows or Java is not knowledge) is nothing to brag about, especially for someone begging for education wink

BTW, if you want to know why MSFT is so highly recommended, it's because projected growth is around 10%, profit margins are around 50%, and the stock pays a dividend so you are GUARANTEED a certain return. Not only that, the moving average has remained stable, no major fluctations and analysts believe MSFT has a strong future pipeline. The recent releases of VS2005 and SQL Server 2005 reinforces this belief as a number of major corporations have finally started to move more of their mission critical applications to Microsoft. Also, analysts are very upbeat about faster growing divisions such as MDS, MED, and MSN, all of which have posted high growths in revenue and profit. Oh, and the P/E is very low making it a bargain stock pick.

It is for these reasons (not out of interest of seeing if MSFT or GOOG will win) that analysts believe MSFT is headed higher than current valuation. If you really did buy MSFT below $25, looks like you lucked out happy
Posted by: java.user   Posted on: 12/22/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

M  P. Douglas | 12/21/05
The is hilarious  Richard Flude | 12/21/05
Just one more time...  X Marks The Spot | 12/21/05
It really is hilarius  bob2cam | 12/22/05
I might frame this one, a classic;-)  Richard Flude | 12/22/05
Google is on borrowed time...  Mike Cox | 12/21/05
Mikey, take a break  Monkey_MCSE | 12/21/05
What's the Hidden Story?  serpentmage | 12/21/05
Great Question  ThomasAnderson | 12/21/05
He's talking about . . .  Plain Logic | 12/21/05
Why should they ?  mbraincell@... | 12/21/05
And they look beyond Kai-Fu Lee  mighetto | 12/21/05
$300 Million Kicker  jjworleyeoe | 12/21/05
Microsoft  ThomasAnderson | 12/21/05
The Google revenue model  Richard Flude | 12/21/05
Correction  java.user | 12/23/05
bang, Bang, BAng, BANg, BANG!  Roger Ramjet | 12/22/05
I buy MSFT & GOOG on same day, now MS up $1.78, GOOG up $147  educateme@... | 12/22/05
Lousy rethoric, lousy stock adivce  bob2cam | 12/22/05
You are correct on several counts, depends on the mirror  educateme@... | 12/22/05
You dropped us the bomb!  java.user | 12/22/05
Verbal bomb to Bob2cam, to you maybe not, Longterm all is risk  educateme@... | 12/22/05
Basic economics  java.user | 12/22/05
Also  java.user | 12/22/05
Smoke Bomb  bob2cam | 12/23/05
Leveraging their monopoly again?  Isidore Nabi | 12/22/05
Consumers should look away from AOL  Boot_Agnostic | 12/25/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here