On mySimon: Samsung 55" LED TV
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 21 of 87:
Next »
« Previous
Re: Answer to Pilate:
<< Claims are either verifiable by physical evidence or else they aren't. If they are, they're facts; if they aren't, they're not. >>

I trust that you are saying you believe there is absolute truth. If so, I concur.

When faced with sticky issues, I keep in mind is that even though a claim cannot be verified by physical evidence today, it doesn't mean it cannot be verified in the future. The number of individuals released from prison due to advances in analyzing DNA evidence comes to mind.

I also keep in mind that there is a good possibility that there are issues/ideas that humankind is incapable of understanding much less verifying, so we may never know the truth about them.

Of course, for the radically humanist, that last idea is as unimaginable as voicing criticism of Presidential policies as a patriotic duty is to the radically religious.
Posted by: tbbrickster_z   Posted on: 12/16/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

On privacy: At the same time...  IndigoDarkwolf | 12/15/05
I'm More Worried About My Neighbors  markdoiron | 12/15/05
who in the world is...  linuxoverwindows | 12/15/05
Now there...  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
Unfortunately...  rapson | 12/15/05
I hope you're kidding...  techboy_z | 12/15/05
I'm pretty sure...  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
No, what I think he was saying is  Real World | 12/15/05
No  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
I disagree  Real World | 12/15/05
Just because...  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
AHHHH! You are such a lost bunch!!  Cayble | 12/15/05
Yeah?  vizenos | 12/15/05
Ironically, your presumption is not correct either  alphachi | 12/15/05
So you're...  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
In a manner of speaking  Real World | 12/15/05
Right!  vizenos | 12/15/05
The problem with truth...  Rob Groh | 12/17/05
Nope...  rapson | 12/15/05
Answer to Pilate:  vizenos | 12/15/05
Re: Answer to Pilate:  tbbrickster_z | 12/16/05
Ouch  pickle@... | 12/16/05
Wow, you used a lot of words to miss my point  Real World | 12/18/05
Relative  Canadian Kodiak | 12/15/05
Relative  Canadian Kodiak | 12/15/05
then how come they dont teach real truth in school?  linuxoverwindows | 12/15/05
Your kidding right?  Cayble | 12/15/05
Your so deep;)  glstorck@... | 12/15/05
Not kidding...  rapson | 12/15/05
On the other hand...  d0ti5 | 12/15/05
Actually, to give two corrections,...  The King's Servant | 12/15/05
Good Point  Cayble | 12/15/05
AAHHHHH.......................  glstorck@... | 12/15/05
you may think so now  mdsmedia | 12/15/05
another debate  CobraA1 | 12/16/05
Counterpoint  techboy_z | 12/15/05
I contribute to Wikipedia  rmcferren | 12/15/05
Dude, I have to do it  Mihi Nomen Est | 12/15/05
actually...  linuxoverwindows | 12/15/05
I'm glad you told me  wresnick | 12/16/05
Same here  kmguru | 12/16/05
4 Months to get Jimmy Wales to remove?  danm50 | 12/15/05
Funny thing is...  The King's Servant | 12/15/05
THIS SUB-THREADLET EXPLAINS THE ABSURDITY OF THE WHOLE ISSUE!  Stegosaurus Cowboy | 12/22/05
Wiki what?  LBean | 12/22/05
Wiki vs. Encyclopedia Brittanica - !!!  ratbiscuit99 | 12/15/05
What if Britannica is wrong?  wresnick | 12/16/05
Wrong Direction  plumley@... | 12/15/05
in addition,...  The King's Servant | 12/15/05
Wrong direction indeed.  LBean | 12/22/05
Wrong direction indeed.  LBean | 12/22/05
Wikipedia is a joke anyway  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
in one breath you say...  The King's Servant | 12/15/05
subjective truth?  Canadian Kodiak | 12/15/05
It is an encyclopedia  mbrierley | 12/16/05
re: It is an encyclopedia  CobraA1 | 12/16/05
Unprofessional article...  mike4kz | 12/15/05
Well Michael  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
Reread his post.  The King's Servant | 12/15/05
tracking ip addresses  ChazzMatt | 12/15/05
IP Address tracking idiocy  Rain-Dragon-At-Stonebridge | 12/15/05
Very true  bumberfsck | 12/15/05
the truth is "out there"  linuxoverwindows | 12/15/05
Go to Wikipedia,...  The King's Servant | 12/15/05
I stand Partially corrected  Rain-Dragon-At-Stonebridge | 12/15/05
in this case, he got lucky...  linuxoverwindows | 12/15/05
Wikipedia Correctness  Opus191963 | 12/15/05
Re: Wikipedia Correctness  belkorin | 12/18/05
You deserve to be ignorant  mmarth | 12/15/05
Best Funded?  Dave P. | 12/16/05
Some clarifying details from Brandt  Daniel Brandt | 12/15/05
Why?  LBean | 12/22/05
Truth  TotalKayeos | 12/15/05
stop wasting your (and our) time  djkk | 12/15/05
What is Truth?  pfekete@... | 12/15/05
Privacy Rejection  ctrevino | 12/15/05
missing your point?  Canadian Kodiak | 12/15/05
Controlling Mis-Information  joereloj | 12/16/05
Controlling Mis-Information  joereloj | 12/16/05
It si not perfect ..  anilbhx@... | 12/16/05
Not perfect but..  anilbhx@... | 12/16/05
Wikipedia is not responsible...  Masnor | 12/16/05
A Simple Solution  kmguru | 12/16/05
Wikipedia's Fundamental Flaw  Dr_Zinj | 12/19/05
Try two versions  putchavn | 12/19/05
Wikipedia is a teenager  daver_z | 12/22/05
Is Wikipedia a credible source for accurate information?  webwhiz | 08/24/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and