On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 52:
Next »
« Previous
Putting out books is NOT cheaper than music
It is obvious that most people here have little if any idea of the
costs involved with writing a book for publication. Keep in mind
that the books Google is attempting to scan for search purposes
are professionally-published academic texts as well as other
subjects both fictional and non-fiction. These publications cost
in the vicinity of thousands of dollars before the first book hits
the shelves.

Take into consideration that the person who wrote it really wants
to be paid for their time. The average first book to reach
publication is the result of hundreds if not thousands of man-
hours to complete the first draft. From there it goes to an editor
or an agent, who will likely reject it, forcing the author to send it
to many agencies or publishers over the course of months or
years before one says, "We'll buy it, but..."

Now comes a back-and-forth between the two, going through
the process of innumerable edits and rewrites until the
publisher's editor is satisfied that it's in saleable condition. In
other words, we now have another few dozens of hours if not
more by a minimum of three people involved.

Now the product goes to the typesetters (ok, granted today it's
done by computers, but still...) where the dies are made for the
actual printing process. From there it goes to print.

Meanwhile, an artist is hired to paint the cover art which adds
even more people to the process and finally everything is put
together to produce the completed book.

That first book now cost somewhere in the area of $15-
$25,000US to make. The publisher determines how many copies
to print and ship to bookstores around the country. Add printing
costs and shipping costs.

Get the idea? It's not just the Authors who can be hurt.

However, by making these texts more available, it becomes
possible for people to learn of them outside of the library and
sample a portion of the book. It allows them to determine if this
is a book they want or need, thus possibly creating demand for
the publication.

In other words, Google's idea is a very valid one that could
benefit everyone, including the Authors and the publishers. If
someone doesn't want their work included, Google is clearly
giving them the opportunity to opt-out at no cost to anyone
other than lost sales.
Posted by: vulpine@...   Posted on: 09/21/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's Napster all over again  LateBlt | 09/20/05
Since when is wanting to make a living  Real World | 09/20/05
Nobody's calling it sinister, but...  LateBlt | 09/20/05
You assume publishing a book is free.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/05
Putting out books is cheaper than music  LateBlt | 09/20/05
Sorry, I still disagree  Real World | 09/21/05
Have you ever written anything?  voska | 09/21/05
Libraries  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
CDS in Libraries  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
try reading the law  voska | 09/21/05
Putting out books is NOT cheaper than music  vulpine@... | 09/21/05
Art is a product  RobertoSalazar | 09/21/05
This has nothing to do with Napster  specialk_z | 09/21/05
Benefit to Authors  Erik1234 | 09/21/05
Back to Napster again we are  specialk_z | 09/21/05
Not quite  ebphoto | 09/22/05
If the book sells the author profits  voska | 09/21/05
Libraries  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
That's your opinion  voska | 09/21/05
Ziiing...  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
Wonderful wink  petit@... | 09/21/05
LOL  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
You said it yourself  specialk_z | 09/21/05
I predict..  jgearhart@... | 09/21/05
Google does not provide a FAIR SEARCH  RobertoSalazar | 09/21/05
Granted, but..  jgearhart@... | 09/21/05
Oops!  John L. Ries | 09/20/05
On second thought...  John L. Ries | 09/20/05
Profiting is not considered fair use.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/20/05
Google Profits  Erik1234 | 09/21/05
Very fine hair  Patrick Jones | 09/21/05
Copyright does not give total control to author/copyright holder.  Root User | 09/20/05
Libraries  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
RE:Copyright does not give total control to author/copyright holder  ebphoto | 09/22/05
Perhaps you Google follk should...  Nigel Johnstone | 09/21/05
That's wrong  rapson | 09/21/05
Should be but it's not  voska | 09/21/05
Wrong, not illegal  rapson | 09/21/05
wrong is open to interpretation  voska | 09/21/05
Spot on!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/21/05
Nope, your wrong. The people the authors guild should be sueing is  Been_Done_Before | 09/21/05
libraries can do this  voska | 09/21/05
You missed the point  rapson | 10/03/05
Just a matter of convenience  jgearhart@... | 09/21/05
Bingo  Henrick Ericcson | 09/21/05
Right  jgearhart@... | 09/21/05
Hmmmm..  jgearhart@... | 09/21/05
Google Is Not The Good Guy  RobertoSalazar | 09/21/05
Google's right  Dr_Zinj | 09/21/05
Is somebody missing the point ?  carel@... | 09/21/05
Dogs in the Manger  thall@... | 09/23/05
Let's stay in the Stone Age, shall we?  pmyhre | 09/23/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here