On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
He signed a nodisclose, noncompete...
agreement. Simple as that. It is leagaly binding. What's so hard to understand about that? MS has intellectual investment in him and do not want to let it go without a fight; he signed the papers, then got caught, along with Google, breeching the agreements he signed.
Posted by: jtnixon   Posted on: 09/07/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Exagerated what he will do for Google, and they are paying him how much.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
the money is irrelevant!  Linux Geek | 09/06/05
Define those criminal actions please.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
Or was it another useless zealot ranting?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
Why are you expending so much emotion on this?  IT_User | 09/06/05
Don't think it's emotion so much as  Jack-Booted EULA | 09/06/05
If he was so important to MS,  el1jones | 09/06/05
Why would you want to keep a thief?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
I think the thief conclusion is a bit premature...  zkiwi | 09/06/05
thief conclusion premature??  D-Ram | 09/06/05
Maybe for you...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
No Axe bit by'the moral quandry  whisperycat | 09/07/05
and yet again...  D-Ram | 09/07/05
He signed a nodisclose, noncompete...  jtnixon | 09/07/05
Everyone will laugh  BaddarThanu | 09/06/05
Taste of their  bmh129 | 09/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here