On GameFAQs: Halo 3 ODST: Where's the last audio log?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
thief conclusion premature??
I thought it plainly says they just want a restraining order untill the trial to determine Theif or not.
"Microsoft is asking King County Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez to issue a preliminary injunction that would block Lee from working for Google BEFORE the trial, which is slated for January. The judge already issued a temporary restraining order in July."
Posted by: D-Ram   Posted on: 09/06/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Exagerated what he will do for Google, and they are paying him how much.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
the money is irrelevant!  Linux Geek | 09/06/05
Define those criminal actions please.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
Or was it another useless zealot ranting?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
Why are you expending so much emotion on this?  IT_User | 09/06/05
Don't think it's emotion so much as  Jack-Booted EULA | 09/06/05
If he was so important to MS,  el1jones | 09/06/05
Why would you want to keep a thief?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
I think the thief conclusion is a bit premature...  zkiwi | 09/06/05
thief conclusion premature??  D-Ram | 09/06/05
Maybe for you...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/06/05
No Axe bit by'the moral quandry  whisperycat | 09/07/05
and yet again...  D-Ram | 09/07/05
He signed a nodisclose, noncompete...  jtnixon | 09/07/05
Everyone will laugh  BaddarThanu | 09/06/05
Taste of their  bmh129 | 09/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here