On last.fm: Ciara radio - Listen now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 45 of 85:
Next »
« Previous
Sent e-mail Copyright office
I sent a e-mail to the Copyright office expressing my concern
about their using IE, but not Firefox, Mozilla, Safari etc.

Read their reply; so sad. I sent a copy of their reply to my
Senator asking him to read it but not to laugh to loudly. One
must laugh to keep from crying.

The following is the reply from the Copyright Office:

We have received an email from you regarding the
proposed rulemaking on electronic-only preregistration.
The comments you submitted cannot be considered because
they were in the form of email. As the instructions in
the Copyright Office's Federal Register notice state,
comments can be delivered to the Copyright Office by the
following means:

If hand delivered by a private party, an original and five
copies of any comment should be brought to Room LM-401
of the James Madison Memorial Building between 8:30 a.m.
and 5 p.m. and the envelope should be addressed as follows:
Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office, James
Madison Memorial Building, Room LM-401, 101 Independence
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20559-6000. If hand delivered
by a commercial courier, an original and five copies of any
comment must be delivered to the Congressional Courier
Acceptance Site located at Second and D Streets, NE.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The envelope
should be addressed as follows: Copyright Office General
Counsel, Room LM-403, James Madison Memorial Building, 101
Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. If sent by mail,
an original and five copies of any comment should be
addressed to: Copyright GC/ I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Southwest
Station, Washington, DC 20024-0400. Comments may not be
delivered by means of overnight delivery services such as
Federal Express, United Parcel Service, etc., due to delays
in processing receipt of such deliveries.

If you wish to submit comments, we strongly urge that you
first read the entire notice of proposed rulemaking published
July 22 (available on the Copyright office website at
http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2005/70fr42286.html) as
well as the supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
published Aug. 4 (available on the Copyright office website
at http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2005/70fr44878.html).
Posted by: RicD_   Posted on: 08/26/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Gee, it's not like digging up a copy of IE is hard.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/26/05
Sweet!  tic swayback | 08/26/05
or the mac (NT)  DarthRidiculous | 08/26/05
Actually, you can get that here:  tic swayback | 08/26/05
It isn't supported anymore  Oscar_Goldman | 08/26/05
Who said Linux?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/26/05
A small percentage still counts...  tic swayback | 08/26/05
I don't have a Microsoft OS in my houw  Oscar_Goldman | 08/26/05
Really?  Otto_Delete | 08/26/05
RE: Who said Linux?  Linux Guy 1000 | 08/26/05
really?  doh123 | 08/26/05
RE: Who said Linux?  nightshade0143 | 08/26/05
Re: RE: Who said Linux?  none none | 08/26/05
Rubbish!!!! I do. (NT)  Zogg | 08/27/05
Beg pardon?  John L. Ries | 08/27/05
Linux Desktop  zztong | 08/29/05
I thought you were a Mac Addict!  osreinstall | 08/27/05
I am, but...  tic swayback | 08/28/05
While You're Up  DannyO_0x98 | 08/29/05
Not the point  DarthRidiculous | 08/26/05
Like it or not, IE is the "User Standard".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/26/05
Better update those numbers  tic swayback | 08/26/05
Not quite 19%  Gungnir | 08/26/05
True  tic swayback | 08/26/05
IE, Official Browser of the Digital Clueless  Otto_Delete | 08/26/05
RE: IE, Official Browser of the Digital Clueless  nightshade0143 | 08/26/05
Doesn't AOL use IE as their browser? (nt)  tic swayback | 08/26/05
current AOL for OS X embeds Safari instead of IE!  dabruro | 08/28/05
Like it or not, iTunes/iPod is the "User (music) Standard"...  MacCanuck | 08/26/05
Put up or shut up  tic swayback | 08/26/05
RE: Like it or not, IE is the "User Standard".  Linux Guy 1000 | 08/26/05
Here I cleaned it up for you...  Linux User 147560 | 08/26/05
Sorry it is not objective!  osreinstall | 08/27/05
Nuh-uh.  tomythius | 08/27/05
You get to be kidding  wexwimpy@... | 08/28/05
Missed the Point  Gungnir | 08/26/05
It's about as difficult  jacarter3 | 08/26/05
Put this in the...  twriter | 08/26/05
Gee, it's not like writting to standards is hard.  DonnieBoy | 08/26/05
Not the point  CobraA1 | 08/28/05
Well duh!  gary.douglas@... | 08/29/05
Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen  tic swayback | 08/26/05
I think you are correct  Otto_Delete | 08/26/05
Now Where Did I Put That IE 3.0 For Sun Copy From 1997??  itanalyst | 08/26/05
Sent e-mail Copyright office  RicD_ | 08/26/05
Real reason  tic swayback | 08/26/05
Come to this century Tic - it won't hurt much!  Confused by religion | 08/26/05
My bad  tic swayback | 08/27/05
You need a new mail admin...  Confused by religion | 08/28/05
Yes we do  tic swayback | 08/29/05
SendMail  Rokstar83 | 08/28/05
I always wondered if it was true...  vdraken | 08/26/05
Now you know why the gov't cannot catch Osama bin Laden  osreinstall | 08/27/05
Isn't Firefox based on Netscape?  Arrg | 08/26/05
Try the other way around...  philaweb | 08/26/05
Creatives Use Macs  PXLated | 08/26/05
Not to mention scientists  tic swayback | 08/26/05
Proves what I said...  Mike Cox | 08/26/05
4.3  nucrash | 08/29/05
Here we go again  philaweb | 08/26/05
Ooops...  philaweb | 08/26/05
Yes, but...  tic swayback | 08/26/05
ActiveX - Microsoft Dangerzone  philaweb | 08/26/05
Dumb programmers, dumber managers  twriter | 08/26/05
Really Stupid!!  Ed_Meyers | 08/26/05
HELLO!?! Did anyone actually read the article?????  doh123 | 08/26/05
The point is they only need one version - written to standards.  DonnieBoy | 08/26/05
ActiveX Browser Plug-in  philaweb | 08/26/05
Ooops again...  philaweb | 08/26/05
Since when do we use tax dollars to help companies.  DonnieBoy | 08/26/05
Jaysus, Mary and Joseph!  Confused by religion | 08/26/05
Re: Jaysus, Mary and Joseph!  none none | 08/26/05
But Microsoft is the beneficiary  tic swayback | 08/27/05
Aw jee as if  jackie40d@... | 08/27/05
Talk about chutpah  waltharvey@... | 08/27/05
Better work on that Yiddish  tic swayback | 08/27/05
Why not test them?  John L. Ries | 08/27/05
Government endorses IE?  nightshade0143 | 08/27/05
Follow web standards, not MS standards, and you won't have this issue...  BitTwiddler | 08/27/05
Hype and crap.  ab@... | 08/27/05
"There was, and is, no intent to endorse a particular vendor,"  CobraA1 | 08/28/05
Hooray!  oblivionxyz@... | 08/28/05
Example of how the real world views the 'issue'  quietLee | 08/29/05
You must remember these are govt employees...  An_Axe_to_Grind | 08/29/05
Civil Service Syndrome  mark70 | 08/29/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here