On BNET: Apple's insanely great marketing
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 11:
Next »
« Previous
Options, not deadlines.
In the beginnings of VoIP, the FCC should have mandated a two-tier service level - BASIC (no 911) and ENHANCED (completely e911 compliant). The misunderstandings, lawsuits, and deadlines we now see today are the direct result of the FCC's inability to tackle this problem early on, leaving a confusing and variable "middle-ground" of 911 scenarios. And, they KNEW it was coming.

Since some VoIP providers are already e911 compliant, a 2-tier scenario would allow market pressure, not mandates, to determine who offers what. And consumers wouldn't have cut-offs to worry about, they'd have 2 distinct "options" to consider - a provider who offers no 911 service at all, or a provider who offers 911 service as the term "911" is traditionally understood.

I'm surprised that no one has suggested this approach. I suspect most VoIP providers would love it ... and most consumers, too.

When life is at stake, there is NO acceptable "middle-ground" for emergency service. That's what needs to be addressed.
Posted by: AlecWest   Posted on: 09/01/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Re: FCC extends E911 deadline for VoIP users  yyuko@... | 08/26/05
Obviously...  rapson | 08/26/05
E911 Deadline  jhw46@... | 08/26/05
E911 Deadline  jhw46@... | 08/26/05
Ohhh, the Irony  ibabadur1 | 08/26/05
Wrong  thirstydog@... | 09/26/05
FoIP  Larry Moluf | 08/26/05
Why not Require 911, even without an account?  aerdmann | 08/27/05
Theory.....  D-Ram | 08/29/05
Options, not deadlines.  AlecWest | 09/01/05
Can someone explain, in 25 words or less...  Otto_Delete | 09/16/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here