On GameFAQs: Xbox 360: Better vertical or horizontal?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 13:
Next »
« Previous
It's really the sad part
Patent examiners work under a quota system that allows them, on average, less than eight hours total to dispose an application. Mind you this is total, including prior art search, first and second action, final disposition - all correspondence, phone calls, you name it.

This works in the traditional mechanical, chemical, electrical arts, where the classification scheme is well ordered and understood, literature well lined up and the engineers hired as patent examiners develop a reasonable degree of expertise.

For software (and here I mean inventions that can only be realized in software, such as operating systems, office automation and the like), the situation is worse than hopeless. Terms are not standardized, constantly evolving technology and meta standards defy classification, and much of what exists isn't "published." A patent search system, if one could devise a workable one, isn't that valuable, because the preponderance of innovation is in open source open literature, not in patent applications.

Why is a European patent worth so much more than its US counterpart, when the two were on a par 20 years ago? Software patents - USPTO capitulated, possibly out of spite, but capitulate it did. At least USPTO can now say "I told you so," but this kind of moral victory is not what should have been sought. It is the US Patent and Trademark Office, not EPO or JPO, whose director terms it an "agency in crisis." The EU, to its everlasting credit, took a sober look at the US fiasco and turned its back on the insanity.

But don't blame the examiners - they are as much the victim as US business and independent software developers. Only the lawyers have won.
Posted by: IT_User   Posted on: 07/28/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

May I patent the idea of reading this story?  BitTwiddler | 07/28/05
Is this even remotely patentable....  el1jones | 07/28/05
Next: Amazon patents method for exchanging money online for goods/services  billywill | 07/28/05
some already patented that...  el1jones | 07/28/05
How about...  andy_r | 07/28/05
Patents Patently Patented, Including Patent Leather and Patently Obvious  DaffyDuck | 07/28/05
Wellllll ......  Linux_4u! | 07/28/05
When did USPS get involved in patents?  IT_User | 07/28/05
My Next Patent  DaffyDuck | 07/28/05
This is so stupid.  xkmail | 07/28/05
The funny part is that "experts" at US Patent Office will accept that.  FirstNLastN | 07/28/05
It's really the sad part  IT_User | 07/28/05
NO PATENT FOR IDEAS, only for implementations and names, etc. (nt)  wessonjoe | 08/02/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here