On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 8:
Next »
« Previous
Whose fault?
Unless I'm mistaken, images and other content aren't indexed by
search engines if they're restricted by robots.txt. And robots.txt is
one of only many ways that they could have protected their
content. If Google/A9 is taking it from a web site that stole the
images, that's who they should be going after.

If the sites aren't taking the precautions they should, I see no
reason why search engines should be sued for doing their jobs.
Posted by: soleary   Posted on: 07/01/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

liability?  drinkmorejava | 07/01/05
Just getting stupid  emcee_z | 07/01/05
Block the spiders, duh.  xkmail | 07/01/05
Whose fault?  soleary | 07/01/05
No Wonder Google Ignored Them  nikoli | 07/03/05
if content is not behind a secure unacceble site that kids can not get too  JasonL31 | 07/05/05
Who should?  voska | 07/05/05
What about articles?  george_ou | 07/06/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads