Publishers balk at Google book copy plan

If that's the case: ...then maybe this isn't quite as bad as it is being made out to be. But if I'm not mistaken, copyright holders must actively protect their copyrights in order for them to be enforceable. So where does one draw the line?

And I still disagree with the idea of 'opt-out'. One should NEVER have to opt out of anything; it should ALWAYS be opt-in.

Carl Rapson; Posted by: rapson Posted on: 05/25/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I don't think it does Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

Media Change Nigel Johnstone | 05/24/05

How about this Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

I don't think... rapson | 05/25/05

But its not Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

Then... rapson | 05/25/05

That's a big "If". No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/05

Fuzzy target, need better OCR TheProtector | 05/25/05

Opt out? rapson | 05/25/05

From the comment above Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

Snippets? rapson | 05/25/05

If that's the case rapson | 05/25/05

What do you think?

Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
Produced by
ZDNet and