Publishers balk at Google book copy plan

Opt out?: Since this involved copyrighted material, shouldn't the copyright holders 'opt in' instead? Isn't reproducing material without the copyright holder's permission, with certain specific exceptions, considered a copyright violation?

Carl Rapson; Posted by: rapson Posted on: 05/25/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I don't think it does Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

Media Change Nigel Johnstone | 05/24/05

How about this Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

I don't think... rapson | 05/25/05

But its not Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

Then... rapson | 05/25/05

That's a big "If". No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/05

Fuzzy target, need better OCR TheProtector | 05/25/05

Opt out? rapson | 05/25/05

From the comment above Nigel Johnstone | 05/25/05

Snippets? rapson | 05/25/05

If that's the case rapson | 05/25/05

What do you think?

Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
More from IBM
How to Drive Better Business Outcomes with Exceptional Web Experiences Download the eBook
Driving Business Agility through SOA Connectivity & Integration Read the White Paper from IBM
Linking Decisions and Information for Organizational Performance Read the Tom Davenport study