Intel to release WiMax chip

TalkBack 17 of 23:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

This who you'd pay

You'd pay for content.

So sure you'd be able to connect to the ever present signals but so what? Who care. That's like being connected to the internet but only being able to ping anywhere in the world but nothing else. Sure you'd be able to set up something with a buddy, do some online gaming over it or something but you still have to buy the game for example.

Where you start paying is when you want all those TV channels. When you want all those movies, games, music or what ever. You'd pay the content guys.

What's the advantage? First off you won't be paying $40 a month for internet access then paying $40 moth for content. You just pay for content.

PS: Canada isn't that sparsely populated. 90% of our people live with in a 6 hour drive of the US border.

Posted by: voska   Posted on: 04/19/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Driving Business Agility through SOA Connectivity & Integration Whitepaper from IBM IBM In this whitepaper, you will learn how to work smarter so you can solve ... Download Now