On BNET: Online porn struggles for profits
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
Hmmm...wrong math and conclusion
This table does say more about market acceptance. Impossible to count cpu's and extrapolate perfomance from it, it just doesn't work that way without knowing how sites are implemented and how they would scale. The numbers you use relate to sites, not cpus if I take a look at the table again.

It's more relevant to the number of sites deploying a specific technology. Itanium does score high in the list, before Opteron or Power4(+). Perhaps some people doubt about the future of the chip, but it seems quite a few people don't, otherwise it would nowhere rank as high in the # of sites. I'd look in my crystal ball to see how it evolves, but it's cloudy in there.
Posted by: Dodi_z   Posted on: 03/31/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The Itanic hasn't sunk yet  Roger Ramjet | 03/31/05
But it's on fire, down by the bow, and listing 20 degrees to starboard. (nt  Letophoro | 03/31/05
More like On its way to pick up passengers, its stuck on a sandbar,  Roger Ramjet | 03/31/05
Here's some reality on Itanium for a change  Dodi_z | 03/31/05
So the link suggests Itanium lacks performance  dwjunix | 03/31/05
Hmmm...wrong math and conclusion  Dodi_z | 03/31/05
Misunderstood your point  dwjunix | 04/01/05
That WOULD be the case  michael-t | 03/31/05
Middle ground  Roger Ramjet | 04/01/05
NOT a good day for Intel servers  gfeier | 03/31/05
Cost savings  Roger Ramjet | 03/31/05
Which Intel Servers  TedB_z | 03/31/05
Hmmm  michael-t | 03/31/05
Market size  TedB_z | 03/31/05
Market adoption  TedB_z | 03/31/05
The sad reality is that  michael-t | 03/31/05
Think about it!!!!  mabricen | 04/01/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement