On mySimon: Top MP3 Players and Accessories
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
Just Talk
The entire world is in shock because Apple is suing Thinksecret.com, Appleinsider.com and Powerpage.com... How can it be? Goliath againts David... send the devil to hell...!!!! #uck Apple!!! Keep in mind those site are gossip site, no news site. Pretty much ZDnet is doing the same.

By allowing any dressed up monkey with internet access who wants to execute its constitutional right of free speech. Unfortunatelly not knowing the topic he is writting about. But who cares !!! it is my right to speak !!!

1) EPIC is the whole reason of Itanium damn it !!!
No EPIC = "another" Processor RISC based!!!! and not a breakthrough.

2) This isn't CPU's problem damn it !!! CPU are intended to handle boolean logic. PERIOD.

3) You said "It demands very wide data buses"...
64 bit is 64 bitanywhere???? just for the sake of verify; is 2 times 32 bit... sure is "wider" than 32 bit x86 counterpart. You don't feed x86 CPU it also stall.

4)Like in #1. Itanium handel interrupt differently. I recommend you to read about Itanium Prediction first then you could figure about multi whatever.

5) Now I know why always desktop comes out first with new CPU and later laptop includes them!!!!
Posted by: mabricen   Posted on: 03/09/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Intel's uncertain processor road-map (or the lack of a road...)  michael-t | 03/08/05
IBM has the advantage here  nucrash | 03/08/05
Intel's problem is  michael-t | 03/08/05
Just Talk  mabricen | 03/09/05
He he he ...  michael-t | 03/09/05
I think Intel would even disagree with your post.  bjbrock | 03/08/05
Very well put.  The King's Servant | 03/08/05
Intel overlooked  michael-t | 03/08/05
Itanium vs. Alpha, not x86  Filker0_z | 03/08/05
Opinion noted  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Back to be Basics?  nucrash | 03/09/05
Cell out  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Itanium Headed for Museum...  Neutrodyne | 03/08/05
I doubt it.  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Wishful thinking on Intel's part  balsover | 03/08/05
Misconception  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Definite shift in the party line  John L. Ries | 03/08/05
Itanium for "Big Iron"?  mwagner@... | 03/08/05
Always room  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Topic of interest: Should we stick with x86?  CobraA1 | 03/09/05
Sticking  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Why Not Emulation  nucrash | 03/09/05
No emulation  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
excuse me?  doh123 | 03/09/05
No, really - according to Intel  fmcgowan | 03/09/05
it has some hardware to help, yes, but  doh123 | 03/09/05
We are stuck with X86 for another 20 years  Prognosticator | 03/10/05
Wishful Thinking  kelkins@... | 03/09/05
Itanic WILL win in the end  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
A couple of points  fmcgowan | 03/09/05
Points taken  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/05
Good to hear back so soon...  fmcgowan | 03/09/05
True, as there is nothing to really encroach on is there?  PaddyOmaddy | 03/09/05
The wild cats in my backyard won't disturb the unicorns..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 03/09/05
Its about market acceptance...  GeiselS@... | 03/09/05
Wait for Itanium? IBM PowerPC G5 is ready right now.  billmichael | 03/13/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline