Judge gives details on landmark VoIP ruling

TalkBack 1 of 2:

Next »

• Thread View
• Flat View

"Vonage" Is Consistent With "Brand X": Where is the Conflict?

This article suggests that the Minnesota decision in Vonage conflicts with the Ninth Circuit decision in "Brand X", possibly giving MPUC support for an appeal. Although I expect MPUC to appeal anyway, it appears to me that both cases consistently interpret the Telecom Act of 1996. I do not see the source of conflict. Perhaps the author could reconsider after reading the discussion of the two cases and their interpretation of the Act at my weblog, "Unintended Consequences" at http://www.dougsimpson.com/blog/archives/000178.html

Douglas Simpson, J.D.
Wethersfield, CT
DougSimpson.com

Posted by: DougSimpson   Posted on: 10/19/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now
• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now