On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
He is correct, it is a waste of development resources
and an example of poor project management. What Intel should have done long ago was MP in the Itanium from day one, if they had the fact that they only emulate x86 processors would have been a non-issue as it would have had adequate x86 performance even as an emulated processor.
Posted by: balsover   Posted on: 03/02/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

*Finally*  bidemytime | 03/01/05
how silly...  Valis Keogh | 03/01/05
Did you actually read my post?  bidemytime | 03/01/05
He is correct, it is a waste of development resources  balsover | 03/02/05
Dual core = huge performance difference  Prognosticator | 03/01/05
You are a Mike Cox wannabe, right?  The King's Servant | 03/01/05
Dunno who Cox is..sorry.. Oh, and.....  Prognosticator | 03/01/05
a bit wrong  doh123 | 03/01/05
Man, what a bunch of idots, they should get one working first.  DonnieBoy | 03/01/05
Hey, idot? They SHOWED one working  Prognosticator | 03/01/05
they had to  doh123 | 03/01/05
Yes, and how many did the ship???  DonnieBoy | 03/01/05
Uh, that's King of The Hill idiot to you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/01/05
Who's the idot?  PayBack | 08/08/05
It's ALL good AMD & Intel  MIS Master | 03/02/05
He is correct, it is a waste of development resources  balsover | 03/02/05
This is good stuff  zeusfuse | 03/06/05
Dual Core operating systems  ltymes | 05/07/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement