On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
Man, what a bunch of idots, they should get one working first.
They are just trying to make it sound like they are doing more than AMD, but the truth is that AMD will have a dual core first. AMD could have also detaild plans for 15 processors.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 03/01/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

*Finally*  bidemytime | 03/01/05
how silly...  Valis Keogh | 03/01/05
Did you actually read my post?  bidemytime | 03/01/05
He is correct, it is a waste of development resources  balsover | 03/02/05
Dual core = huge performance difference  Prognosticator | 03/01/05
You are a Mike Cox wannabe, right?  The King's Servant | 03/01/05
Dunno who Cox is..sorry.. Oh, and.....  Prognosticator | 03/01/05
a bit wrong  doh123 | 03/01/05
Man, what a bunch of idots, they should get one working first.  DonnieBoy | 03/01/05
Hey, idot? They SHOWED one working  Prognosticator | 03/01/05
they had to  doh123 | 03/01/05
Yes, and how many did the ship???  DonnieBoy | 03/01/05
Uh, that's King of The Hill idiot to you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/01/05
Who's the idot?  PayBack | 08/08/05
It's ALL good AMD & Intel  MIS Master | 03/02/05
He is correct, it is a waste of development resources  balsover | 03/02/05
This is good stuff  zeusfuse | 03/06/05
Dual Core operating systems  ltymes | 05/07/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More