On last.fm: Michael Jackson radio - Listen now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 13:
Next »
« Previous
Multi-core as in 2 or real multi-core?
Most of the gist of that article was regarding dual core chips. No one really started talking about the level of multi-core technology expressed here.

If they do stick to it good for them. If they decide to charge more when it goes beyond 2 cores then it could get sticky.

happy
Posted by: crocd   Posted on: 12/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Does this mean M$ can charge more for one server?  crocd | 12/17/04
Could, but won't  PA-ITGuy | 12/17/04
Multi-core as in 2 or real multi-core?  crocd | 12/17/04
MS has stated the pricing will be based on sockets.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/17/04
Intel no longer has the best x86 CPU. Since  bjbrock | 12/17/04
And you thought  Roger Ramjet | 12/17/04
Collusion...  Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 12/17/04
So why is MS supporting AMD then?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/17/04
Active Management Technology  Traveler2 | 12/17/04
Well, I willn't be the one to get carried away, either.  Grayson Peddie | 12/19/04
I was also thinking about the dual/tripple/quad-core processor, too.  Grayson Peddie | 12/19/04
Troll Alert!  Roger Ramjet | 12/20/04
Please don't call me a troll.  Grayson Peddie | 12/20/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and