On TV.com: ADAM LAMBERT'S A Big Faker
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 31:
Next »
« Previous
... Exactly Correct, and also the masses do not need more CPU Power.
You are correct. The real problem is the decline of the PC industry. The only thing that made every next generation of chip cheaper and faster, was increasing volume. Those days are gone forever. Intel already has problems even now with little or no hope of high volume Itanium usage. That chip will never see mainstream use, and Intel will probably never break even on it. Mostly what Intel is doing now is concentrating on making the P4's cheaper.

The only way to pay for $B fabs is by selling more and more chips. But it is now going the other way. Volume is falling. No one needs an Itanium PC to send email, and that is what the majority of PC users are doing today.

The economic problem is far more difficult to solve than the technology problem. The PC revolution, at least this phase of it, is mature.
Posted by: Gizmo_z   Posted on: 12/02/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Moore's Law and Intel  cbradshaw@... | 12/01/03
An much more fundamental limit...  Jomo_z | 12/01/03
... Exactly Correct, and also the masses do not need more CPU Power.  Gizmo_z | 12/02/03
The Itanium is not a consumer CPU.  balsover | 12/02/03
3rd dimension ?  Goulu | 12/01/03
2008  Peter Komisar | 12/01/03
And how much do you want to pay?  Gizmo_z | 12/02/03
Sorry, it doesn't work that way  HalcyonSeven | 12/02/03
Intel scientists running out of tricks  MarcB_z | 12/01/03
Re: Re: Intel scientists running out of tricks  issthatso | 12/01/03
Get a clue  Prognosticator | 12/01/03
Got a clue, do you?  MarcB_z | 12/01/03
They both  rkadowns | 12/01/03
True  MarcB_z | 12/01/03
Haven't heard much about Quantum processors lately  voska | 12/01/03
They are meant to be developing  quantumstate | 06/12/06
RE: valence orbit  JCitizen | 04/27/04
Are you paying attention?  balsover | 12/02/03
RISC development Cycle is still robust  MarcB_z | 12/02/03
Light Cubes  tomr1yarbrough | 12/01/03
Very true and I agree, this is the next step.  rkadowns | 12/01/03
They will find a way.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/03
Brain Speed  Nullifidian | 12/01/03
Brain speed....not!  Jomo_z | 12/01/03
Brain Speed  medezark | 04/26/04
Speed of Light and Speed of design-to-market  michael-t | 12/01/03
IA64 Not going to happen for Desktop  Gizmo_z | 12/02/03
64 bit computing is on the desktop NOW  MarcB_z | 12/02/03
Electrons are never destroyed - it's against the laws of physics!  CobraA1 | 06/12/06
Yes it is badly worded  quantumstate | 06/12/06
The whole moores law thing is getting ridiculous  quantumstate | 06/12/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here