On CHOW: Why do onions make you cry?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 33:
Next »
« Previous
and the point of this argument being
so they running linux on 6.4% of there entire system and specialist stuff on the rest of the nodes. why would they need the compatibleness of a windows machine if its mainly specialist stuff are they. i mean it would be nice to play super fast solitaire and have a media player that loads up fast but for a researcher i just dont think thats what they need. i think in these fights. well dogging of ms is just silly as linux and ms mainly target different groups of people to each other. linux target the snobby know alls of software that like messing around with systems and ms target people who dont really care to much about there computer as long as they can access there email,the sort of people that have better things to with there time. Im just sick of seeing the same old argument come up in every topic no matter what the topic is. i hoped to see some real comments on this board.
Posted by: Humph   Posted on: 11/08/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

WHAT OS IS RUNNING ON THE IBM MACHINE?  itanalyst | 11/05/04
Nice.  libertyaikido | 11/05/04
Linux (NT)  WDS_z | 11/05/04
They needed that much CPU power to make Linux work.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
RE: They needed that much CPU power to make Linux work.  richdave | 11/05/04
on this machine Windows performance is measured in teracrashes!  rotvic | 11/05/04
Quadrillion !!!!!!  kenw44@... | 11/05/04
Quadrillion is legit....  ruprick_z | 11/05/04
Does Quadrillion qualify as a Butt Ton or a Buttload?  itanalyst | 11/05/04
Sick of Linux users big time  Bit Wize | 11/05/04
I Stepped Off My Cloud For A Minute  itanalyst | 11/05/04
Dealing with it  trm1945 | 11/09/04
cloudy thinking  paulj_z | 11/10/04
sick of that discussion. always the same...  victor batscheff | 11/05/04
I hear that  MarkE_z | 11/10/04
RE: sick of Linux users...  sir_cheats_a_lot | 11/05/04
Windows 95?!?!  WebDevBB | 11/06/04
I am sure you are using Windoze Xp and service pak 2 as well.  JohnBeaman | 11/09/04
"grammer"school?  paulj_z | 11/10/04
Linux Setup  MarkE_z | 11/10/04
RE: Sick of Linux users big time  richdave | 11/05/04
Maybe you might want to look at this...  Fairlane | 11/05/04
and the point of this argument being  Humph | 11/08/04
6.4%??  Fairlane | 11/08/04
Don't Forget The MAC(Linux) users  MarkE_z | 11/10/04
MAC OS = Unix not Linux  rborchert | 11/16/04
Linux on the high end - a glimpse of the future.  George Mitchell | 11/05/04
yeah,  victor batscheff | 11/05/04
RE: yeah,  richdave | 11/05/04
I am amazed at the posts  JohnBeaman | 11/09/04
Commentaries (in general)  89710848-ginterv | 11/13/04
All of that power  agottschald | 11/14/04
Oh! and not a mention of L*, W* or M*  agottschald | 11/14/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More