WHAT OS IS RUNNING ON THE IBM MACHINE?
itanalyst | 11/05/04
|

Nice.
libertyaikido | 11/05/04
|

Linux (NT)
WDS_z | 11/05/04
|

They needed that much CPU power to make Linux work.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/05/04
|
 
RE: They needed that much CPU power to make Linux work.
richdave | 11/05/04
|

on this machine Windows performance is measured in teracrashes!
rotvic | 11/05/04
|
Quadrillion !!!!!!
kenw44@... | 11/05/04
|

Quadrillion is legit....
ruprick_z | 11/05/04
|
 
Does Quadrillion qualify as a Butt Ton or a Buttload?
itanalyst | 11/05/04
|
Sick of Linux users big time
Bit Wize | 11/05/04
|

I Stepped Off My Cloud For A Minute
itanalyst | 11/05/04
|
 
Dealing with it
trm1945 | 11/09/04
|
 
cloudy thinking
paulj_z | 11/10/04
|

sick of that discussion. always the same...
victor batscheff | 11/05/04
|
 
I hear that
MarkE_z | 11/10/04
|

RE: sick of Linux users...
sir_cheats_a_lot | 11/05/04
|
 
Windows 95?!?!
WebDevBB | 11/06/04
|
  
I am sure you are using Windoze Xp and service pak 2 as well.
JohnBeaman | 11/09/04
|
   
"grammer"school?
paulj_z | 11/10/04
|
  
Linux Setup
MarkE_z | 11/10/04
|

RE: Sick of Linux users big time
richdave | 11/05/04
|

Maybe you might want to look at this...
Fairlane | 11/05/04
|
 
and the point of this argument being
Humph | 11/08/04
|
  
6.4%??
Fairlane | 11/08/04
|

Don't Forget The MAC(Linux) users
MarkE_z | 11/10/04
|
 
MAC OS = Unix not Linux
rborchert | 11/16/04
|
Linux on the high end - a glimpse of the future.
George Mitchell | 11/05/04
|
yeah,
victor batscheff | 11/05/04
|

RE: yeah,
richdave | 11/05/04
|
 
I am amazed at the posts
JohnBeaman | 11/09/04
|
Commentaries (in general)
89710848-ginterv | 11/13/04
|
All of that power
agottschald | 11/14/04
|

Oh! and not a mention of L*, W* or M*
agottschald | 11/14/04
|