On TV.com: TRUE BLOOD Meets a Werewolf Biker Gang
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
Simple question... Simpler answer...
If, instead of Apple, the company name were Microsoft, I know quite a few pundits in the media and the government that would be hell-bent on breaking up such "monopoly".

Why, then, should Apple enjoy such immunity?


Many reasons, none the least of which include:

1.) Apple is the underdog. People like underdogs.

2.) Apple has an excellent marketing department that has the ability to make things seem MUCH cooler than they really are.

3.) Apple has a cult following who are willing to throw themselves on hand grenades if Steve Jobs life were in danger.

4.) Microsoft is the "evil" empire. They played for blood to get to where they are now.

5.) On that same note - Microsoft got sued by the feds and various states on the basis of their aforementioned behavior and lost. Apple has yet to be sued for their equally bad behavior.

If you'll recall, a LOT of people were calling for a Microsoft breakup during their trial. The judge decided against going that far (for better, worse or otherwise).

While Apple does enjoy a bit of a monopoly - in so far as the hardware goes that you can run their OS on, it's never been illegal to create an OS that only runs on your own brand of hardware. IBM's done it, DEC's done it, Sun's done it - in fact, pretty much EVERY major computer vendor's done it.
Posted by: Wolfie2K3   Posted on: 04/17/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

More cheap excuses for questionable changes  wackoae | 04/17/08
If this were a scam  Michael Kelly | 04/17/08
Good Point  Sub-Nav | 04/17/08
get a clue...  brokndodge@... | 04/18/08
CC processors like stagant sales over growth.  dan_withrow | 04/21/08
Actually...  jt@... | 04/25/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  Heenan73 | 04/17/08
"Mac" is not a company  Stuka | 04/17/08
OMG!!!  foghorn4@... | 04/18/08
Attention: Apple!!  schneb | 04/17/08
I Would Love One of Those Myself, Schneb  drprod@... | 04/21/08
Sue in EU  srobtjones@... | 04/17/08
Netkas is greedy...  Narg | 04/17/08
Nope, he is just another Stallman-like wacko (n/t)  markbn | 04/18/08
Does netkas have a case?  Dr_Zinj | 04/21/08
you must be stupid  gtajoemama@... | 04/25/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone ... and litigation agains product bundling  lamp299 | 04/17/08
Simple question... Simpler answer...  Wolfie2K3 | 04/17/08
How can they charge for OS-X?  seybutts | 04/17/08
it's not apple's osx...  brokndodge@... | 04/18/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  iceprincess0966 | 04/18/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  bill_abbott_iv | 04/18/08
The Macopoly's days are numbered.  spaamport | 04/18/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  warwoodpet | 04/19/08
FUD  magallanes | 04/21/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  Vadim P. | 04/21/08
LOL, Suckers  binaryspiral | 04/21/08
these people at Psystar, if legit, are idiots...  hkremer | 04/21/08
they are trailblazers  james.faction | 04/21/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  alxnsc@... | 04/21/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  chuck@... | 04/21/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  rigo12 | 04/22/08
FrankenMac  michael.tindall@... | 04/23/08
Psystar proposes also Ubuntu, Window XP and Vista....  alex.arica | 04/25/08
RE: Cheap Mac clone draws angry response  jt@... | 04/25/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here