On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 20 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
Yes, everything is relative but we have what we have.
When people buy a computer - they do not care why Mac
does not perform as it should be ...

Please, pay attention to what I wrote:

I wrote if ... you use Adobe Premiere ..., if ...., etc. - G5 Mac
is about 2.5 times slower than the PC (= G5 Mac is 2-2.5
times more expensive for TYPICAL USERS).

Do not forget - Adobe Premiere vs. Final Cut Pro is twice
cheaper ...

and ...

... the majority people are not photo/video/audio
professionals.
--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------

I also think that Panther is better than MS Windows,

but ...

Panther is only $129 (less than MS Windows). Why Mac
should be so expensive if Mac is so slow ...?
--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------

The bottom line:

It would be OK if Mac is not the fastest computer if ...

... if Mac would be the cheapest computer ...

According to my research - many people love Mac but
cannot afford it (especially now).

If Apple would port OS X on Intel platform (existing PCs) -
the problem would be solved = no Apple monopoly (niche
market).
Posted by: Vily Clay   Posted on: 11/11/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Smart ITC people  FirstNLastN | 11/11/03
agree  lmaxwell | 11/11/03
Who's next, BA?  Fred Fredrickson | 11/11/03
Smart ITC people, indeed..  d_jedi | 11/11/03
whatever sells...  tooner440 | 11/11/03
re: whatever sells...  tooner440 | 11/11/03
Ditch the markup  Fred Fredrickson | 11/11/03
thanks  tooner440 | 11/18/03
reposting...  tooner440 | 11/18/03
and one more time...  tooner440 | 11/18/03
Thanks....  Palmyra | 11/11/03
That's M$ hand again!  screaming silence | 11/11/03
That's MS Hand Again!  wadeprater | 11/11/03
things are changing  lmaxwell | 11/11/03
Oh, so I guess....  BitTwiddler | 11/11/03
2.5 times slower & more expensive G5, but Apple is happy.  Vily Clay | 11/11/03
2.5 times slower? wrong  theo_durcan | 11/11/03
Poor Comparisons  Harry Bardal | 11/11/03
why only compare to intel  zijiang | 11/11/03
Yes, everything is relative but we have what we have.  Vily Clay | 11/11/03
Agree to disagree  mds_z | 11/13/03
You have a link to the article?  Rick_K | 11/11/03
Is Macworld journal Dec. 2003 too expensive for you?  Vily Clay | 11/11/03
Vily clueless as usual  bgoss@... | 11/11/03
Look in the mirror first and then read the links.  Vily Clay | 11/11/03
You still have no proof  Fred Fredrickson | 11/11/03
Are you too poor to buy Macworld Dec 2003?  Vily Clay | 11/12/03
What problem?  altereqo | 11/11/03
Yes, if Mac would be the cheapest - no problems.  Vily Clay | 11/12/03
Time to boycott U.K., ehh  FilledOut | 11/12/03
Test it against Athlon64!  zeusfuse | 11/12/03
Best Hardware  issthatso | 11/12/03
RE: Test it against the Athlon 64  JakAttak | 11/12/03
What computer can you buy right now....  mlindl | 11/12/03
What is the difference between a workstation..  mlindl | 11/12/03
$13,000.00 Apple PC  boatelc | 11/13/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement