On mySimon: Morgan Red Retro Bike
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Agreed
I see the MS Surface and the iPhone as two different things. The technology behind their touch screens is totally different, and they are built for two separate things. I like the surface, I am not sure why they went with infrared over multi-touch, but I for one would rather see this in a hotel or a restaurant as something new for me to use than a 3.5" phone that I have already had for the past 5 years anyway.

--
Max ... Out!
http://www.cmyos.com - free online operating system
http://www.cmyblogs.com - free blogging platform
Posted by: maxemail@...   Posted on: 11/09/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

ooh, neat-o  lumpy_blumpkin | 11/08/07
MS already beat the iPhone and are on to bigger and better things  NonZealot | 11/08/07
awesome!  lumpy_blumpkin | 11/08/07
... ?  t3h | 11/08/07
I doubt most people think it would be worth the cost.  CobraA1 | 11/08/07
Funny Video  P. Douglas | 11/09/07
Yup, and PCs used to cost $5K  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/09/07
PCs did things that were infeasible to do otherwise.  CobraA1 | 11/10/07
Think vs Is  gbentley@... | 11/12/07
We use them here...  Mike Cox | 11/08/07
.... mmmmm  fredsmith6 | 11/09/07
RE: Bumps on the road to Microsoft's Surface  NemesisNL | 11/08/07
lost dice?  stevey_d | 11/12/07
Agreed  maxemail@... | 11/09/07
MS + Hardware = Rock + Hard Place  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/09/07
Anyone can do anything  Ole Man | 11/12/07
Can I play Duke Nukem Forever on Surface?  buddhistMonkey | 11/10/07
Awaiting this as much as an Apple gamestation  Boot_Agnostic | 11/13/07
I won't be buying this  John Musbach | 11/13/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads