On CHOW: COOKBOOKS make great gifts: TOP 12 picks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 11 of 11:
« Previous
Hm...
Seems to me that the form of government in the typical publicly traded corporation bears a large resemblance to 19th century political machines in the US. In both cases, management has developed a large number of tricks to prevent or discourage voters from making adverse decisions (obfuscation not being the least of them). This is compounded by the fact that stock is often purchased for speculative purposes; which makes for a lot of short-term stockholders who are not likely to go through the bother of making their voices heard.

So, while in theory, stockholders can vote out corrupt self-interested managers with the greatest of ease, so could the people of New York City when Boss Tweed was in charge. Funny thing was, Tweed had to go to jail before voters could be persuaded to remove his supporters from office.

John L. Ries
Posted by: John L. Ries   Posted on: 06/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

$0 Stock options bought a house?  Nigel Johnstone | 06/25/04
Irony, search on Cisco and Pension  Nigel Johnstone | 06/25/04
Toilet paper 21cents/roll, Stock Options FREE!  Nigel Johnstone | 06/25/04
There's a lot of regular Joes with options  merlinmurph | 06/25/04
Why aren't lottery tickets free?  Nigel Johnstone | 06/25/04
Options are voted on by shareholders  merlinmurph | 06/25/04
Expensing Options not same as blocking options  Nigel Johnstone | 06/25/04
I agree  merlinmurph | 06/25/04
No hat, just Black-Scholes  Nigel Johnstone | 06/25/04
Not meant for these options  merlinmurph | 06/25/04
Hm...  John L. Ries | 06/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc