On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 11:
Next »
« Previous
Fast, but cost-effective?
While these systems are being rated for speed and power, what should also figure into the equation is the cost of setting up these systems. I have a feeling that the Apple System X would capture and hold the no. 1 spot on those two criteria.
Posted by: YuridaMan   Posted on: 06/21/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

While the world focuses on Microsoft, IBM is slowly taking over...  Plain Logic | 06/20/04
Questions...  jurasek@... | 06/20/04
Don't know about all of them...  dscherf | 06/21/04
The DELL website lists simple ...  kd5auq | 06/21/04
How fast is fast  Nullifidian | 06/21/04
That's ridiculous; off by many, many orders of magnitude  Atlant | 06/22/04
Blue Gene fades...  techboy_z | 06/21/04
faster processors  J. D. S. | 06/21/04
Linearity  Letophoro | 06/21/04
Fast, but cost-effective?  YuridaMan | 06/21/04
Apple X based on Power G5 versus Itanium2's  The King's Servant | 09/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and